Public Perception of AI: A Case Study in Greece

The way in which AI technology is understood and accepted by non-specialists will largely determine its impact and diffusion. There is therefore a need for ongoing research into public perception of the development of AI and its impact on different areas of human life. Our study seeks to explore the perceptions of 193 non-experts as to whether they are positive or negative about specific developments that reflect the impact of AI in areas of personal and professional life, as well as in society in general. They are also asked to give their opinion on the likelihood of these developments occurring in the future. As a result of the study, a criticality map shows the developments for which participants say they find opportunities for themselves and society and those for which different decision-makers and R&D need to address people’s concerns and meet their needs. Comparing our results with those of a similar study in Germany, our study seems to confirm that people’s expectations and evaluations of AI depend (i) on the characteristics of the group of participants (ii) on the culture and socio-economic context in which the participants live and (iii) on the context in which AI is implemented (e.g., education vs. labor market).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24018/ejai.2025.4.4.73
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Perception of AI: A Case Study in Greece

Giorgos Panselinas, Athanasia Psyllaki, Georgios Vouzaxakis
European Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Public Perception of AI: A Case Study in Greece

Giorgos Panselinas, Athanasia Psyllaki, Georgios Vouzaxakis
article en

Abstract

The way in which AI technology is understood and accepted by non-specialists will largely determine its impact and diffusion. There is therefore a need for ongoing research into public perception of the development of AI and its impact on different areas of human life. Our study seeks to explore the perceptions of 193 non-experts as to whether they are positive or negative about specific developments that reflect the impact of AI in areas of personal and professional life, as well as in society in general. They are also asked to give their opinion on the likelihood of these developments occurring in the future. As a result of the study, a criticality map shows the developments for which participants say they find opportunities for themselves and society and those for which different decision-makers and R&D need to address people’s concerns and meet their needs. Comparing our results with those of a similar study in Germany, our study seems to confirm that people’s expectations and evaluations of AI depend (i) on the characteristics of the group of participants (ii) on the culture and socio-economic context in which the participants live and (iii) on the context in which AI is implemented (e.g., education vs. labor market).

European Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningVol. 4(4)
University of Crete (GR), Hellenic Open University (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.