The resale right in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

The article is devoted to the analysis of judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning the interpretation of the provisions of Directive 2001/84/EC of 27 September 2001 on the resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art. To achieve the objectives of the article, the content of the following judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union has been examined: Fundación Gala-Salvador Dalí (C-518/08, 2010) and Christie’s France SNC v Syndicat national des anti-quaires (C-41/14, 2015). The study examines the main trends in harmonising the mechanismsfor applying the resale right within the European legal space. Particular attention is paid to the concept of ’’distorting effect’’ as understood in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the context of the resale right. Conclusionsare drawn regarding the main directions of unifying the procedure for exercising the resale right in the European Union. It is established that the harmonisation mechanism under study is aimed at ensuring broad legal opportunities within national legal systems for developing local models for the implementation of the resale right. It is also noted that harmonisation of resale right legislation is limited to unifying provisions of national laws that have a direct and immediate effect on the functioning of the art market. Based on the analysis of the Court of Justice's rulings, the article concludes that determining the specific circle of persons who inherit the resale right, or the persons responsible for paying royalties, remains within the competence of the legislator in each Member State and, according to the Court's case law, does not have a direct impact on the functioning of the art market.The incorporation of the resale right into the national legislation of EU Member States plays a fundamentally important role in ensuring proper conditions for the protection of the economic rights of authors of artistic works and in establishing fair competition within the art market. The resale right serves as a tool for maintaining a balance between the rights of artists across different jurisdictions within the EU, and, as a result, contributes to the creation of an effective mechanism for preventing infringements and avoiding unfair competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33731/32025.338625
Primary Topic
Art History and Market Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The resale right in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Olena Starchenko
Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property
Art History and Market Analysis
article

The resale right in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Olena Starchenko
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning the interpretation of the provisions of Directive 2001/84/EC of 27 September 2001 on the resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art. To achieve the objectives of the article, the content of the following judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union has been examined: Fundación Gala-Salvador Dalí (C-518/08, 2010) and Christie’s France SNC v Syndicat national des anti-quaires (C-41/14, 2015). The study examines the main trends in harmonising the mechanismsfor applying the resale right within the European legal space. Particular attention is paid to the concept of ’’distorting effect’’ as understood in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the context of the resale right. Conclusionsare drawn regarding the main directions of unifying the procedure for exercising the resale right in the European Union. It is established that the harmonisation mechanism under study is aimed at ensuring broad legal opportunities within national legal systems for developing local models for the implementation of the resale right. It is also noted that harmonisation of resale right legislation is limited to unifying provisions of national laws that have a direct and immediate effect on the functioning of the art market. Based on the analysis of the Court of Justice's rulings, the article concludes that determining the specific circle of persons who inherit the resale right, or the persons responsible for paying royalties, remains within the competence of the legislator in each Member State and, according to the Court's case law, does not have a direct impact on the functioning of the art market.The incorporation of the resale right into the national legislation of EU Member States plays a fundamentally important role in ensuring proper conditions for the protection of the economic rights of authors of artistic works and in establishing fair competition within the art market. The resale right serves as a tool for maintaining a balance between the rights of artists across different jurisdictions within the EU, and, as a result, contributes to the creation of an effective mechanism for preventing infringements and avoiding unfair competition.

Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property(3)
Human Growth Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Art History and Market Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.