Flaming Shadows: Girodet and the Incarnate Spectator

Abstract: This essay argues that Anne-Louis Girodet's mythological paintings, specifically his Endymion and Pygmalion and Galatea , do not position the spectator as the subject of rational vision. With light and shadow transforming the paintings into more troubling scenes with blurry objects, illegible backgrounds, and corporeal confusion, the spectator cannot be understood as the subject of rational vision. Formal scrutiny informed by Condillacian sensationalism enables us to consider Girodet's mythological paintings as agentive objects that ignited disorienting spectatorial encounters for Girodet himself, his contemporaneous audiences, and even us. Ultimately, this essay considers how Girodet's mythological paintings failed to bind the spectator to the eye of discarnate reason when they were made and pass this failure to present day viewers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online)
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/ecy.2024.a969440
Primary Topic
French Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flaming Shadows: Girodet and the Incarnate Spectator

Michael Feinberg
˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online)
French Literature and Criticism
article

Flaming Shadows: Girodet and the Incarnate Spectator

Michael Feinberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay argues that Anne-Louis Girodet's mythological paintings, specifically his Endymion and Pygmalion and Galatea , do not position the spectator as the subject of rational vision. With light and shadow transforming the paintings into more troubling scenes with blurry objects, illegible backgrounds, and corporeal confusion, the spectator cannot be understood as the subject of rational vision. Formal scrutiny informed by Condillacian sensationalism enables us to consider Girodet's mythological paintings as agentive objects that ignited disorienting spectatorial encounters for Girodet himself, his contemporaneous audiences, and even us. Ultimately, this essay considers how Girodet's mythological paintings failed to bind the spectator to the eye of discarnate reason when they were made and pass this failure to present day viewers.

˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online)Vol. 65(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
French Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.