Experiment-based calibration in psychology: Foundational and data-generating model

Experiment-based calibration is a novel method for measurement validation, which – unlike classical validity metrics – does not require stable between-person variance. In this approach, the latent variable to be measured is manipulated by an experiment, and its predicted scores – termed standard scores – are compared against the measured scores. Previous work has shown that under plausible boundary conditions, the correlation between standard and measured scores – termed retrodictive validity – is informative about measurement accuracy, i.e. combined trueness and precision. Here, I expand these findings in several directions. First, I formalise the approach in a probability-theoretic framework with the concept of a standardised calibration space. Second, I relate this framework to classical validity theory and show that the boundary conditions in fact apply to any form of criterion validity, including classical convergent validity. Thus, I state precise and empirically quantifiable boundary conditions under which criterion validity metrics are informative on validity. Third, I relate these boundary conditions to confounding variables, i.e. correlated latent variables. I show that in the limit, calibration will converge on the latent variable that is most closely related to the standard. Finally, I provide a framework for modelling the data-generating process with Markov kernels, and identify sufficient conditions under which the data generation model results in a calibration space. In sum, this article provides a formal probability-theoretic framework for experiment-based calibration and facilitates modelling and empirical assessment of the data generating processes. • A formal model for experiment-based calibration is simplified and generalised. • This reveals novel boundary conditions for classical convergent validity. • Formalising the role of confounds reveals convergence on theory-defined latent variable. • A new formal data-generating model aids future simulation and empirical work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2025.102950
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiment-based calibration in psychology: Foundational and data-generating model

Dominik R. Bach
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Experiment-based calibration in psychology: Foundational and data-generating model

Dominik R. Bach
article en

Abstract

Experiment-based calibration is a novel method for measurement validation, which – unlike classical validity metrics – does not require stable between-person variance. In this approach, the latent variable to be measured is manipulated by an experiment, and its predicted scores – termed standard scores – are compared against the measured scores. Previous work has shown that under plausible boundary conditions, the correlation between standard and measured scores – termed retrodictive validity – is informative about measurement accuracy, i.e. combined trueness and precision. Here, I expand these findings in several directions. First, I formalise the approach in a probability-theoretic framework with the concept of a standardised calibration space. Second, I relate this framework to classical validity theory and show that the boundary conditions in fact apply to any form of criterion validity, including classical convergent validity. Thus, I state precise and empirically quantifiable boundary conditions under which criterion validity metrics are informative on validity. Third, I relate these boundary conditions to confounding variables, i.e. correlated latent variables. I show that in the limit, calibration will converge on the latent variable that is most closely related to the standard. Finally, I provide a framework for modelling the data-generating process with Markov kernels, and identify sufficient conditions under which the data generation model results in a calibration space. In sum, this article provides a formal probability-theoretic framework for experiment-based calibration and facilitates modelling and empirical assessment of the data generating processes. • A formal model for experiment-based calibration is simplified and generalised. • This reveals novel boundary conditions for classical convergent validity. • Formalising the role of confounds reveals convergence on theory-defined latent variable. • A new formal data-generating model aids future simulation and empirical work.

Journal of Mathematical PsychologyVol. 127
University of Bonn (DE), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University Hospital Bonn (DE), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.