Corporate liability after Car Wash

Operation Car Wash (OCW) followed one of the largest corruption scandals in Brazil’recent history, leaving broad effects on Brazil’s legal order. This paper highlights the rather underexplored spillovers into the law on corporate liability. OCW brought massive financial and reputational damage to major corporations, impacting all corporate stakeholder, while extensive use of leniency agreements revealed detailed accounts of unlawful schemes and the involvement of corporate agents, including controlling shareholders. Together, those elements made corporate law a tool for rebalancing OCW’s transversal implications. Through doctrinal analysis and illustrative cases, the paper traces and describes three main developments: (i) investors’ standing to sue public companies for losses tied to misconduct; (ii) growing scrutiny of controlling shareholders’ liability for corporate wrongdoing; and (iii) expanded application of the principle of protecting corporate activities. The paper argues these spillovers generated relevant doctrinal advances and may inform broader debates on corporate liability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2292
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate liability after Car Wash

Anna Binotto
1 citations
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
3.13
article

Corporate liability after Car Wash

Anna Binotto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Operation Car Wash (OCW) followed one of the largest corruption scandals in Brazil’recent history, leaving broad effects on Brazil’s legal order. This paper highlights the rather underexplored spillovers into the law on corporate liability. OCW brought massive financial and reputational damage to major corporations, impacting all corporate stakeholder, while extensive use of leniency agreements revealed detailed accounts of unlawful schemes and the involvement of corporate agents, including controlling shareholders. Together, those elements made corporate law a tool for rebalancing OCW’s transversal implications. Through doctrinal analysis and illustrative cases, the paper traces and describes three main developments: (i) investors’ standing to sue public companies for losses tied to misconduct; (ii) growing scrutiny of controlling shareholders’ liability for corporate wrongdoing; and (iii) expanded application of the principle of protecting corporate activities. The paper argues these spillovers generated relevant doctrinal advances and may inform broader debates on corporate liability.

Oñati Socio-legal SeriesVol. 16(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.