Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Ventilatory Constraints, And Qualitative Aspects Of Dyspnea Among Breast Cancer Survivors With Obesity

PURPOSE: Breast cancer survivors may experience exercise intolerance due to deconditioning, but respiratory impairment also plays a role. Obesity itself is known to increase ventilatory constraints during exercise. Little is known about how obesity and breast cancer affect exercise tolerance. We evaluated cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), ventilatory constraints, and qualitative aspects of dyspnea in breast cancer survivors with obesity. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (58.9 ± 8.9 yr, BMI: 34.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2) completed pulmonary function testing and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) was calculated as >35% overlap between tidal and maximal expiratory flow-volume loops. Dynamic hyperinflation was calculated as a > 150 mL decrease in inspiratory capacity from rest to exercise. Participants rated 15 descriptors of dyspnea on a scale of 0 to 10. Data are expressed as Mean ± SD and unpaired t-tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: 25% of participants had low CRF (VO2peak < 85% predicted). Dead space breathing (VD/VT) was higher among patients with low CRF (18.63 ± 1.51 vs. 14.92 ± 3.36; P = 0.0002). At peak exercise, 69% of participants experienced dynamic hyperinflation. Maximum expiratory pressure (%predicted) was lower among patients with dynamic hyperinflation vs. those without (69.8 ± 15.8 vs. 90.1 ± 25.9; P = 0.0102). Dyspnea descriptors including smothering, air hunger, and suffocation were rated higher among patients with dynamic hyperinflation vs. those without (P = 0.0107, P = 0.0170, and P = 0.0149, respectively). At peak exercise, 31% of participants experienced EFL. Forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) and mid expiratory flows (FEF25-75) were lower among patients with EFL vs. those without EFL (78.8 ± 2.67 vs. 82.7 ± 4.32%; P = 0.0140 and 99.1 ± 13.9 vs 121.7 ± 32.8%pred; P = 0.0102). CONCLUSIONS: 1 in 4 breast cancer survivors with obesity are deconditioned. Most patients experience ventilatory constraints during exercise, which could be due to lower expiratory muscle strength and lower mid expiratory flows. Exercise testing should be considered among patients with exercise intolerance or exertional dyspnea to help uncover factors that may be contributing to reduced CRF and tailor exercise prescriptions. Supported by: PELOTONIA GR130528, K12CA133250

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157412.93234.46
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Ventilatory Constraints, And Qualitative Aspects Of Dyspnea Among Breast Cancer Survivors With Obesity

Celia W. Nusekabel, Martin Lundy, Shashank Jaiswal, Dharini M. Bhammar et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Ventilatory Constraints, And Qualitative Aspects Of Dyspnea Among Breast Cancer Survivors With Obesity

Celia W. Nusekabel, Martin Lundy, Shashank Jaiswal, Dharini M. Bhammar, Sion Hangma Limbu, Sagar Sardesai, Zachary Mako, M. Wesley Milks, Jing Gennie Wang, Michael Beck, Mark Foster, Heinz Röhr, Rae I. S. Glover, Atsushi Takanashi, Kareena Sarwal
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast cancer survivors may experience exercise intolerance due to deconditioning, but respiratory impairment also plays a role. Obesity itself is known to increase ventilatory constraints during exercise. Little is known about how obesity and breast cancer affect exercise tolerance. We evaluated cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), ventilatory constraints, and qualitative aspects of dyspnea in breast cancer survivors with obesity. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (58.9 ± 8.9 yr, BMI: 34.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2) completed pulmonary function testing and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) was calculated as >35% overlap between tidal and maximal expiratory flow-volume loops. Dynamic hyperinflation was calculated as a > 150 mL decrease in inspiratory capacity from rest to exercise. Participants rated 15 descriptors of dyspnea on a scale of 0 to 10. Data are expressed as Mean ± SD and unpaired t-tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: 25% of participants had low CRF (VO2peak < 85% predicted). Dead space breathing (VD/VT) was higher among patients with low CRF (18.63 ± 1.51 vs. 14.92 ± 3.36; P = 0.0002). At peak exercise, 69% of participants experienced dynamic hyperinflation. Maximum expiratory pressure (%predicted) was lower among patients with dynamic hyperinflation vs. those without (69.8 ± 15.8 vs. 90.1 ± 25.9; P = 0.0102). Dyspnea descriptors including smothering, air hunger, and suffocation were rated higher among patients with dynamic hyperinflation vs. those without (P = 0.0107, P = 0.0170, and P = 0.0149, respectively). At peak exercise, 31% of participants experienced EFL. Forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) and mid expiratory flows (FEF25-75) were lower among patients with EFL vs. those without EFL (78.8 ± 2.67 vs. 82.7 ± 4.32%; P = 0.0140 and 99.1 ± 13.9 vs 121.7 ± 32.8%pred; P = 0.0102). CONCLUSIONS: 1 in 4 breast cancer survivors with obesity are deconditioned. Most patients experience ventilatory constraints during exercise, which could be due to lower expiratory muscle strength and lower mid expiratory flows. Exercise testing should be considered among patients with exercise intolerance or exertional dyspnea to help uncover factors that may be contributing to reduced CRF and tailor exercise prescriptions. Supported by: PELOTONIA GR130528, K12CA133250

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.