Reaching The ‘Rural Park Bench’ Through The Exercise For Cancer To Enhance Living Well (excel) Study

INTRODUCTION: Individuals living with and beyond cancer in rural/remote settings face reduced accessibility to exercise programming as a supportive cancer care resource, and as a result report poorer health and lower quality of life. The EXercise for Cancer to Enhance Living Well (EXCEL) study is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial that delivers 12-week online and in-person exercise programs for Canadians living with and beyond cancer in rural/remote communities (population < 100,000). EXCEL operates through six provincial hub sites located at large universities across Canada. Understanding the rural/remote reach and consequent demographics is warranted to improve future exercise program implementation. PURPOSE: To assess the rural/remote ‘reach’ of the EXCEL trial alongside participant demographics. Methods: This is a preliminary analysis of the ongoing EXCEL study for reach (guided by the RE-AIM framework) into the rural/remote setting. The great-circle distance from anonymized participant home location (postal code) to their assigned EXCEL central hub site was calculated using the R package gdistance and ggmap. Descriptive characteristics are reported as means and standard deviations. RESULTS: A total of 715 participants out of the current n = 1448 in EXCEL (Mage = 58 ± 14 years; 87% female) had geographic data. The mean distance from participant location to assigned hub site was 327 ± 407 miles. The majority of participants were married (65%), making over $100 k CAD per year (41%), had completed college/university (51%), and were either retired (33%) or on disability (26%). Rural location heat map to be included in presentation of results. CONCLUSIONS: The EXCEL program demonstrates a robust ability to reach underserved rural/remote communities across Canada. The prevalence of retirement or disability status among participants highlights the potential benefits of accessible, home-based interventions, which can improve participation in exercise programs and overall health outcomes for individuals with limited mobility or those living in geographically isolated areas. Future work will examine characteristics of participants, including health-related factors, to inform optimizing delivery of exercise oncology programs to rural/remote individuals living with and beyond cancer. Supported by: CCS-CIHR Team Grant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001158008.89906.48
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reaching The ‘Rural Park Bench’ Through The Exercise For Cancer To Enhance Living Well (excel) Study

Margaret L. McNeely, Julianna Dreger, Isabelle Doré, Jonathan Low et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Reaching The ‘Rural Park Bench’ Through The Exercise For Cancer To Enhance Living Well (excel) Study

Margaret L. McNeely, Julianna Dreger, Isabelle Doré, Jonathan Low, Daniel Sibley, Daniel Santa Mina, Colleen Ann Cuthbert, Linda Trinh, Alexia Piché, Chad W. Wagoner, L Capozzi, Melanie R. Keats, Emma McLaughlin, Kelly MacKenzie, Kristin Campbell, Tom Christensen, Nicole Culos-Reed, Jocelyn Cannon, Sean Sawer
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Individuals living with and beyond cancer in rural/remote settings face reduced accessibility to exercise programming as a supportive cancer care resource, and as a result report poorer health and lower quality of life. The EXercise for Cancer to Enhance Living Well (EXCEL) study is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial that delivers 12-week online and in-person exercise programs for Canadians living with and beyond cancer in rural/remote communities (population < 100,000). EXCEL operates through six provincial hub sites located at large universities across Canada. Understanding the rural/remote reach and consequent demographics is warranted to improve future exercise program implementation. PURPOSE: To assess the rural/remote ‘reach’ of the EXCEL trial alongside participant demographics. Methods: This is a preliminary analysis of the ongoing EXCEL study for reach (guided by the RE-AIM framework) into the rural/remote setting. The great-circle distance from anonymized participant home location (postal code) to their assigned EXCEL central hub site was calculated using the R package gdistance and ggmap. Descriptive characteristics are reported as means and standard deviations. RESULTS: A total of 715 participants out of the current n = 1448 in EXCEL (Mage = 58 ± 14 years; 87% female) had geographic data. The mean distance from participant location to assigned hub site was 327 ± 407 miles. The majority of participants were married (65%), making over $100 k CAD per year (41%), had completed college/university (51%), and were either retired (33%) or on disability (26%). Rural location heat map to be included in presentation of results. CONCLUSIONS: The EXCEL program demonstrates a robust ability to reach underserved rural/remote communities across Canada. The prevalence of retirement or disability status among participants highlights the potential benefits of accessible, home-based interventions, which can improve participation in exercise programs and overall health outcomes for individuals with limited mobility or those living in geographically isolated areas. Future work will examine characteristics of participants, including health-related factors, to inform optimizing delivery of exercise oncology programs to rural/remote individuals living with and beyond cancer. Supported by: CCS-CIHR Team Grant

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Dalhousie University (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Knoxville College (US), Université de Montréal (CA), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.