Utility Of Verification Test For Determination Of Vo2max In Recreationally Active Females

PURPOSE: A constant-load exercise bout to exhaustion (verification test) after a graded exercise test (GXT) is a valid method for confirmation of true maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). However, females have been underrepresented in prior research on this topic. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of a verification test to elicit VO2max in recreationally active females. METHODS: 18 females (mean ± SD age: 30 ± 7 years, BMI: 22.1 ± 1.9 kg) performed an incremental ramp GXT on a cycle ergometer, followed by 10-min of active recovery, followed by a constant-load verification test (100% maximal workload achieved during GXT) until volitional fatigue. VO2 and heart rate (HR) were continuously measured using indirect calorimetry and Polar HR monitor, respectively. For the ramp and verification tests, the mean of the two highest consecutive 15-sec VO2 averages was taken as VO2max. The highest recorded HR was taken as the HR maximum (HRmax) on the ramp and verification tests. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess differences in VO2max and HRmax between tests within-subject. Pearson’s correlations were used to assess relationships between time on each test and differences in VO2max and HRmax. RESULTS: VO2max did not differ between ramp (2.15 ± 0.45 L/min) and verification (2.13 ± 0.35 L/min) tests (p = 0.64). Similarly, HRmax did not differ between ramp (177 ± 9 bpm) and verification (178 ± 10 bpm) tests (p = 0.54). However, 8 participants (44%) achieved a VO2max that was ≥2% (range: +2.0 to 10.2%; 0.04 to 0.16 L/min) higher than during the ramp test, and 10 participants (56%) achieved a higher HRmax during the verification test (range: +2 to 10 bpm). Furthermore, the highest VO2max (2.20 ± 0.42 L/min) and HRmax (180 ± 10 bpm) achieved on either test (ramp or verification) was significantly higher than the VO2max (2.15 ± 0.45 L/min, p = 0.004) and HRmax (177 ± 9 bpm, p = 0.004) achieved on the ramp test alone. Finally, differences in both VO2max and HRmax between the 2 tests (verification-ramp) were inversely correlated with the duration of the ramp test (r = -0.75, p < 0.001 and r = -0.56, p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A verification test may be a useful tool for determining the highest VO2max and HRmax during cycle ergometry in recreationally active females, particularly in individuals with shorter ramp tests. Supported by: Texas Woman's University ORSP Small Grant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001158308.79205.75
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility Of Verification Test For Determination Of Vo2max In Recreationally Active Females

Derek Miketinas, Siddhartha S. Angadi, Erika R. Zoellner, Mindy Patterson et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Physical Activity and Health
article

Utility Of Verification Test For Determination Of Vo2max In Recreationally Active Females

Derek Miketinas, Siddhartha S. Angadi, Erika R. Zoellner, Mindy Patterson, Glenn A. Gaesser, Wesley J. Tucker, Emma W. Ware, Adelle Kanaan, Zainabou Akum
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: A constant-load exercise bout to exhaustion (verification test) after a graded exercise test (GXT) is a valid method for confirmation of true maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). However, females have been underrepresented in prior research on this topic. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of a verification test to elicit VO2max in recreationally active females. METHODS: 18 females (mean ± SD age: 30 ± 7 years, BMI: 22.1 ± 1.9 kg) performed an incremental ramp GXT on a cycle ergometer, followed by 10-min of active recovery, followed by a constant-load verification test (100% maximal workload achieved during GXT) until volitional fatigue. VO2 and heart rate (HR) were continuously measured using indirect calorimetry and Polar HR monitor, respectively. For the ramp and verification tests, the mean of the two highest consecutive 15-sec VO2 averages was taken as VO2max. The highest recorded HR was taken as the HR maximum (HRmax) on the ramp and verification tests. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess differences in VO2max and HRmax between tests within-subject. Pearson’s correlations were used to assess relationships between time on each test and differences in VO2max and HRmax. RESULTS: VO2max did not differ between ramp (2.15 ± 0.45 L/min) and verification (2.13 ± 0.35 L/min) tests (p = 0.64). Similarly, HRmax did not differ between ramp (177 ± 9 bpm) and verification (178 ± 10 bpm) tests (p = 0.54). However, 8 participants (44%) achieved a VO2max that was ≥2% (range: +2.0 to 10.2%; 0.04 to 0.16 L/min) higher than during the ramp test, and 10 participants (56%) achieved a higher HRmax during the verification test (range: +2 to 10 bpm). Furthermore, the highest VO2max (2.20 ± 0.42 L/min) and HRmax (180 ± 10 bpm) achieved on either test (ramp or verification) was significantly higher than the VO2max (2.15 ± 0.45 L/min, p = 0.004) and HRmax (177 ± 9 bpm, p = 0.004) achieved on the ramp test alone. Finally, differences in both VO2max and HRmax between the 2 tests (verification-ramp) were inversely correlated with the duration of the ramp test (r = -0.75, p < 0.001 and r = -0.56, p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A verification test may be a useful tool for determining the highest VO2max and HRmax during cycle ergometry in recreationally active females, particularly in individuals with shorter ramp tests. Supported by: Texas Woman's University ORSP Small Grant

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Texas Woman's University (US), University of Virginia (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.