Seasonal Changes In Total And Regional Body Composition In Collegiate Football Players By Position

PURPOSE: Position-specific differences in body composition in American football players have been established. How total and regional (trunk, arms, legs) composition changes from pre- to post-season is unknown. Thus, this study examined longitudinal changes in total and regional body composition in NCAA Division I football players (CFP) over a competitive season. METHODS: A total of 188 male CFP aged 18-23 (20.7 ± 1.6 yrs) were included in this study. Body composition was measured via dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during the pre- and post-season. Participants were grouped positionally into defensive backs (DB), defensive lineman (DL), linebackers (LB), offensive linemen (OL), punters/kickers (PK), quarterbacks (QB), running backs (RB), tight ends (TE), and wide receivers (WR). Repeated-measures ANOVA assessed effects of season and position on total and regional body composition. Post hoc pairwise comparisons determined magnitude, direction, and significance of changes in each position. RESULTS: There were significant differences in all body composition metrics (p < 0.0001) by position. There were no significant changes in total or regional measures of fat mass across the competitive season. Similarly, there was no significant changes in total or regional measures of mass or bone mass (bone mineral content) from pre- to post-season. There was a significant decrease in total lean mass (LM) (kg) from pre- to post-season in DB (-1.06 ± 1.99), DL (-0.73 ± 2.75), OL (-1.66 ± 3.03), PK (-1.62 ± 2.17), RB (-1.31 ± 2.40), TE (-1.41 ± 2.52), and WR (-1.17 ± 1.58) (p < 0.05 for all). Regionally, arm LM (kg) decreased significantly in DB (-0.28 ± 0.42) (p < 0.05). In addition, leg LM (kg) decreased significantly in DB (-0.44 ± 1.00), DL (-0.46 ± 1.27), OL (-0.65 ± 1.38), PK (-0.85 ± 0.76), RB (-0.80 ± 1.02), TE (-0.65 ± 0.93) and WR (-0.61 ± 0.81) (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in trunk LM from pre- to post-season. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that there is a decrease in total LM over the course of a competitive season in CFP. The present study demonstrates that this loss in LM mainly comes from the leg and arm regions of the body and occurs across all positions. This information can be used by strength and nutrition staff to develop new strategies to prevent this loss of LM over the course of a season.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001160940.62019.99
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonal Changes In Total And Regional Body Composition In Collegiate Football Players By Position

Sandra Brooks, Donald R. Dengel
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Seasonal Changes In Total And Regional Body Composition In Collegiate Football Players By Position

Sandra Brooks, Donald R. Dengel
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Position-specific differences in body composition in American football players have been established. How total and regional (trunk, arms, legs) composition changes from pre- to post-season is unknown. Thus, this study examined longitudinal changes in total and regional body composition in NCAA Division I football players (CFP) over a competitive season. METHODS: A total of 188 male CFP aged 18-23 (20.7 ± 1.6 yrs) were included in this study. Body composition was measured via dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during the pre- and post-season. Participants were grouped positionally into defensive backs (DB), defensive lineman (DL), linebackers (LB), offensive linemen (OL), punters/kickers (PK), quarterbacks (QB), running backs (RB), tight ends (TE), and wide receivers (WR). Repeated-measures ANOVA assessed effects of season and position on total and regional body composition. Post hoc pairwise comparisons determined magnitude, direction, and significance of changes in each position. RESULTS: There were significant differences in all body composition metrics (p < 0.0001) by position. There were no significant changes in total or regional measures of fat mass across the competitive season. Similarly, there was no significant changes in total or regional measures of mass or bone mass (bone mineral content) from pre- to post-season. There was a significant decrease in total lean mass (LM) (kg) from pre- to post-season in DB (-1.06 ± 1.99), DL (-0.73 ± 2.75), OL (-1.66 ± 3.03), PK (-1.62 ± 2.17), RB (-1.31 ± 2.40), TE (-1.41 ± 2.52), and WR (-1.17 ± 1.58) (p < 0.05 for all). Regionally, arm LM (kg) decreased significantly in DB (-0.28 ± 0.42) (p < 0.05). In addition, leg LM (kg) decreased significantly in DB (-0.44 ± 1.00), DL (-0.46 ± 1.27), OL (-0.65 ± 1.38), PK (-0.85 ± 0.76), RB (-0.80 ± 1.02), TE (-0.65 ± 0.93) and WR (-0.61 ± 0.81) (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in trunk LM from pre- to post-season. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that there is a decrease in total LM over the course of a competitive season in CFP. The present study demonstrates that this loss in LM mainly comes from the leg and arm regions of the body and occurs across all positions. This information can be used by strength and nutrition staff to develop new strategies to prevent this loss of LM over the course of a season.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Minnesota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.