Health impact assessments should be mandatory for all relevant government policies

Consistent and systematic integration of health considerations in upstream political decision making is needed to improve population health and enhance health equity. Previous research supports the effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments (HIA), as a key component of a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach, demonstrating its ability to influence cross-government policies that affect health and health equity. HiAP is an approach to embedding health and health equity in multi-sector decision making. Despite proven potential, HIA has historically been used sporadically and opportunistically rather than as a part of routine policy making. Here we argue that mandatory HIA in national policy, as part of an overall HiAP approach, is needed to achieve effective and sustained cross-government action on health and equity. Implementing mandatory HIAs would ensure that health considerations are routinely evaluated in policy decisions, enabling governments to proactively address health disparities and improve public well-being. Harnessing the benefits of HIA requires political commitment to an evidence-informed approach to population health, with dedicated civil service support, and a mandatory screening and assessment process for significant policies. A systematic and obligatory approach would foster accountability, enhance policy coherence and ultimately promote health and equity. It would also send a clear message that consideration of health is a non-negotiable in every policy decision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105436
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health impact assessments should be mandatory for all relevant government policies

Joanna Purdy, Anna J. Stevenson, Ben Harris‐Roxas, Fiona Haigh et al.
3 citations
Health Policy
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
7.27
article

Health impact assessments should be mandatory for all relevant government policies

Joanna Purdy, Anna J. Stevenson, Ben Harris‐Roxas, Fiona Haigh, Ian Holdroyd, Liz Green, Salim Vohra, John D. Ford, Monica O’Mullane, Daniel Black, M. Joanne Douglas, Ben Cave, Martin Birley, Heidi Lynch, Rowena Ekermawi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Consistent and systematic integration of health considerations in upstream political decision making is needed to improve population health and enhance health equity. Previous research supports the effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments (HIA), as a key component of a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach, demonstrating its ability to influence cross-government policies that affect health and health equity. HiAP is an approach to embedding health and health equity in multi-sector decision making. Despite proven potential, HIA has historically been used sporadically and opportunistically rather than as a part of routine policy making. Here we argue that mandatory HIA in national policy, as part of an overall HiAP approach, is needed to achieve effective and sustained cross-government action on health and equity. Implementing mandatory HIAs would ensure that health considerations are routinely evaluated in policy decisions, enabling governments to proactively address health disparities and improve public well-being. Harnessing the benefits of HIA requires political commitment to an evidence-informed approach to population health, with dedicated civil service support, and a mandatory screening and assessment process for significant policies. A systematic and obligatory approach would foster accountability, enhance policy coherence and ultimately promote health and equity. It would also send a clear message that consideration of health is a non-negotiable in every policy decision.

Health PolicyVol. 162
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Groningen (NL), University of Cambridge (GB), University College Cork (IE), UNSW Sydney (AU), Public Health England (GB), Institute of Public Health (IE), Department of Health (TW), Public Health Scotland (GB), Bristol Industrial and Research Associates (United Kingdom) (GB), Faculty of Public Health (GB), National Public Health Laboratory (NP), Daniel Black and Associates (United States) (US), Arup Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.