How We Stand Before Things to Come: Cavell as Reader of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin

Beneath Stanley Cavell's philosophy for the future lies a view of history and historicity expressed by the ideas of 'declining decline' and 'finding as founding'. In this article, I analyze how such ideas arise from readings of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin. In his dialogues with these thinkers, Cavell engages with issues in the philosophy of history that are mostly absent from discussions of human life within the analytic tradition. I claim that Cavell's notion of the ordinary is as much inherited from this engagement as from the philosophies of language of Austin and Wittgenstein. I end by suggesting that despite Cavell's fascination with Heidegger, his philosophy for the future is in fact closer to Benjamin in the way they both conceive relations between art and the ordinary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2025.2559084
Primary Topic
Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How We Stand Before Things to Come: Cavell as Reader of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin

Sofia Miguéns
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
article

How We Stand Before Things to Come: Cavell as Reader of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin

Sofia Miguéns
article en

Abstract

Beneath Stanley Cavell's philosophy for the future lies a view of history and historicity expressed by the ideas of 'declining decline' and 'finding as founding'. In this article, I analyze how such ideas arise from readings of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin. In his dialogues with these thinkers, Cavell engages with issues in the philosophy of history that are mostly absent from discussions of human life within the analytic tradition. I claim that Cavell's notion of the ordinary is as much inherited from this engagement as from the philosophies of language of Austin and Wittgenstein. I end by suggesting that despite Cavell's fascination with Heidegger, his philosophy for the future is in fact closer to Benjamin in the way they both conceive relations between art and the ordinary.

International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How We Stand Before Things to Come: Cavell as Reader of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin — Sofia Miguéns · International Journal of Philosophical Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS