Anaerobic Exercises Improve The Balance And Stability Of Young Adults.

Human bodies adjust and control side-to-side motion for safe walking [1]. Mediolateral center of mass velocity (MLCoMv), a measure of mediolateral control, increases when we encounter a new surface, or are exposed to other environmental factors [2]. However, limited research exists on how habitual exercise influences MLCoMv during walking. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of exercise type and gait speed on the MLCoMv during four conditions: overground, tandem, beam, and stepping-stone walking. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy young adults (aerobic = 11, anaerobic = 11, inactive = 12; 20F; age: 21 ± 2 years; height: 172.5 ± 10 cm; mass: 71.4 ± 16.2 kg). Full body marker-based motion capture was used to assess walking patterns for each condition. MLCOMv was calculated using Vicon's Dynamic Plug-in Gait model, which incorporates subject-specific anthropometric measurements for accurate center of mass estimation. Peak MLCOMv was calculated using the highest MLCOMv frame occurred and averaged across each trial. We conducted a generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM), using the participants and the conditions as variables that control the model´s variability. Estimated marginal means were calculated to get the contrast. RESULTS: Our GLMM did not reveal significant differences in the speed (χ2 = 0.005, p = 0.94). However, we observed difference in the type of exercises (χ2 = 44.78, p < 0.001). For participants who did aerobic exercise, their MLCoMv increased by least 1.02 and 1.04 times more than the ones who performed anaerobic and inactive, respectively (Z ratio = 7.39 & 5.95, p < 0.001). In inactive participants, it increased by at least 1 time compared to participants who performed anaerobic (Z ratio = 4.45, p < 0.001), indicating a need for more time to stabilize. CONCLUSION: Based on our sample, we observed that participants who performed anaerobic exercises demonstrated slower side-to-side movements. The higher lateral velocities in aerobic exercisers might reflect a more dynamic walking pattern, though further investigation is needed to understand if this represents a training-specific adaptation. [1] Pandy, M. G., Lin, Y., & Kim, H. J. (2010b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.010 [2] Chou, L., Kaufman, K. R., Hahn, M. E., & Brey, R. H. (2002b). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00067-x

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001156136.01737.1f
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Training Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anaerobic Exercises Improve The Balance And Stability Of Young Adults.

Silvia Vargas, Jaimie A. Roper, Brandon M. People
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Physical Education and Training Studies
article

Anaerobic Exercises Improve The Balance And Stability Of Young Adults.

Silvia Vargas, Jaimie A. Roper, Brandon M. People
article en

Abstract

Human bodies adjust and control side-to-side motion for safe walking [1]. Mediolateral center of mass velocity (MLCoMv), a measure of mediolateral control, increases when we encounter a new surface, or are exposed to other environmental factors [2]. However, limited research exists on how habitual exercise influences MLCoMv during walking. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of exercise type and gait speed on the MLCoMv during four conditions: overground, tandem, beam, and stepping-stone walking. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy young adults (aerobic = 11, anaerobic = 11, inactive = 12; 20F; age: 21 ± 2 years; height: 172.5 ± 10 cm; mass: 71.4 ± 16.2 kg). Full body marker-based motion capture was used to assess walking patterns for each condition. MLCOMv was calculated using Vicon's Dynamic Plug-in Gait model, which incorporates subject-specific anthropometric measurements for accurate center of mass estimation. Peak MLCOMv was calculated using the highest MLCOMv frame occurred and averaged across each trial. We conducted a generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM), using the participants and the conditions as variables that control the model´s variability. Estimated marginal means were calculated to get the contrast. RESULTS: Our GLMM did not reveal significant differences in the speed (χ2 = 0.005, p = 0.94). However, we observed difference in the type of exercises (χ2 = 44.78, p < 0.001). For participants who did aerobic exercise, their MLCoMv increased by least 1.02 and 1.04 times more than the ones who performed anaerobic and inactive, respectively (Z ratio = 7.39 & 5.95, p < 0.001). In inactive participants, it increased by at least 1 time compared to participants who performed anaerobic (Z ratio = 4.45, p < 0.001), indicating a need for more time to stabilize. CONCLUSION: Based on our sample, we observed that participants who performed anaerobic exercises demonstrated slower side-to-side movements. The higher lateral velocities in aerobic exercisers might reflect a more dynamic walking pattern, though further investigation is needed to understand if this represents a training-specific adaptation. [1] Pandy, M. G., Lin, Y., & Kim, H. J. (2010b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.010 [2] Chou, L., Kaufman, K. R., Hahn, M. E., & Brey, R. H. (2002b). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00067-x

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Physical Education and Training Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.