Exploration Of Preferred And Metabolically Optimal Walk-Run Transition Speeds During Gait With Body Weight Support

An individual’s gait transition speed between walking and running may be constrained by a change in environment such as through body weight support (BWS). Therefore, it is important to investigate the gait transition speed between walking and running at different BWS levels. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate preferred transition speed (PTS) and metabolically optimal transition speed (MOTS) between walking and running at different levels of BWS. METHODS: Ten individuals (42.2 ± 17.6 years) participated in this study. Firstly, participant’s mode-specific PTS was measured for 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS conditions. Following the mode-specific PTS measurement, participants performed the actual gait tests. The BWS conditions consisted of 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS for walking and running. The speed conditions consist of walking and running at PTS, PTS ± 0.3 km/h, and PTS ± 0.6 km/h. Oxygen uptake, stride frequency (SF), and stride length (SL) were measured during the tests. Mode-specific PTS was analyzed using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05). Oxygen uptake, SF, and SL were analyzed using a 2 (mode) x 3 (BWS) x 5 (speed) repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mode-specific PTS was not significantly different between BWS conditions (i.e., 6.2 ± 1.0 km/h, 6.2 ± 1.1 km/h, and 5.7 ± 1.3 km/h for 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS conditions, respectively: P = 0.075). Oxygen uptake was influenced by the interaction of mode, BWS, and speed (P < 0.01). However, SF and SL were not influenced by the interaction of mode, BWS, and speed (P > 0.05). Oxygen uptake and SF during running were 17.1% ~ 27.6% and 12.8% ~ 19.9% greater than when walking at 0%BWS and 20%BWS conditions, respectively, across the different speeds. Additionally, SL during running was 14.3% ~ 24.2% shorter than when walking at 0%BWS and 20%BWS conditions, across the different speeds. Oxygen uptake during running at 20%BWS was 15.7% and 16.8% lower than that of 0%BWS at PTS + 0.3 km/h and PTS-0.3 km/h conditions, respectively (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, SL during running increased with increasing speed at 0%BWS and 20%BWS conditions (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: PTS and MOTS between walking and running may be different during gait at 0%BWS and 20%BWS. Supported by: Supported by JSPS Grant Number 20 K11336.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161296.30783.8f
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploration Of Preferred And Metabolically Optimal Walk-Run Transition Speeds During Gait With Body Weight Support

Alina P. Swafford, Kenji Masumoto, John A. Mercer, Crystal Hadfield et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Exploration Of Preferred And Metabolically Optimal Walk-Run Transition Speeds During Gait With Body Weight Support

Alina P. Swafford, Kenji Masumoto, John A. Mercer, Crystal Hadfield, Katsiaryna Afanasyeva
article en

Abstract

An individual’s gait transition speed between walking and running may be constrained by a change in environment such as through body weight support (BWS). Therefore, it is important to investigate the gait transition speed between walking and running at different BWS levels. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate preferred transition speed (PTS) and metabolically optimal transition speed (MOTS) between walking and running at different levels of BWS. METHODS: Ten individuals (42.2 ± 17.6 years) participated in this study. Firstly, participant’s mode-specific PTS was measured for 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS conditions. Following the mode-specific PTS measurement, participants performed the actual gait tests. The BWS conditions consisted of 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS for walking and running. The speed conditions consist of walking and running at PTS, PTS ± 0.3 km/h, and PTS ± 0.6 km/h. Oxygen uptake, stride frequency (SF), and stride length (SL) were measured during the tests. Mode-specific PTS was analyzed using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05). Oxygen uptake, SF, and SL were analyzed using a 2 (mode) x 3 (BWS) x 5 (speed) repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mode-specific PTS was not significantly different between BWS conditions (i.e., 6.2 ± 1.0 km/h, 6.2 ± 1.1 km/h, and 5.7 ± 1.3 km/h for 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS conditions, respectively: P = 0.075). Oxygen uptake was influenced by the interaction of mode, BWS, and speed (P < 0.01). However, SF and SL were not influenced by the interaction of mode, BWS, and speed (P > 0.05). Oxygen uptake and SF during running were 17.1% ~ 27.6% and 12.8% ~ 19.9% greater than when walking at 0%BWS and 20%BWS conditions, respectively, across the different speeds. Additionally, SL during running was 14.3% ~ 24.2% shorter than when walking at 0%BWS and 20%BWS conditions, across the different speeds. Oxygen uptake during running at 20%BWS was 15.7% and 16.8% lower than that of 0%BWS at PTS + 0.3 km/h and PTS-0.3 km/h conditions, respectively (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, SL during running increased with increasing speed at 0%BWS and 20%BWS conditions (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: PTS and MOTS between walking and running may be different during gait at 0%BWS and 20%BWS. Supported by: Supported by JSPS Grant Number 20 K11336.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Mercer (Czechia) (CZ), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Kyushu University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.