Flood susceptibility mapping in the Nyabarongo Catchment, Rwanda, based on data analysis and modeling

Rwanda’s Nyabarongo catchment frequently experiences floods, highlighting the need for effective flood susceptibility analysis and management. This study mapped flood susceptibility in the catchment using the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models, as well as various conditioning factors including elevation, curvature, aspect, distance to river (DTRiver), Distance to road (DTRoad), normalized difference vegetation index, slope, curve number, topographic wetness index (TWI) and rainfall. RF was the best performing model with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.968 and an F1-score of 0.92, demonstrating its high performance and robustness in flood susceptibility analysis. In addition, RF, combined with SHAP, provided both robust and interpretable results. The study found that DTRiver, TWI, DTRoad, and slope had the highest influence on model predictions, while curve number had the least. RF classified the area into five flood susceptibility classes: very high (6%), high (9.6%), moderate (15.1%), low (26.6%), and very low (42.7%), accurately reflecting environmental and geo-topographic conditions. Based on these findings, mitigation measures can be designed to reduce flood risk in the Nyabarongo catchment. Additionally, the models have potential for application across Rwanda to improve flood susceptibility management and could be adapted for use globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2025.2556987
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flood susceptibility mapping in the Nyabarongo Catchment, Rwanda, based on data analysis and modeling

Seyed Amir Naghibi, Umaru Garba Wali, Gilbert Nduwayezu, Erik Nilsson et al.
2 citations
Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
article

Flood susceptibility mapping in the Nyabarongo Catchment, Rwanda, based on data analysis and modeling

Seyed Amir Naghibi, Umaru Garba Wali, Gilbert Nduwayezu, Erik Nilsson, Magnus Larson, Leonard Nzabonantuma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rwanda’s Nyabarongo catchment frequently experiences floods, highlighting the need for effective flood susceptibility analysis and management. This study mapped flood susceptibility in the catchment using the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models, as well as various conditioning factors including elevation, curvature, aspect, distance to river (DTRiver), Distance to road (DTRoad), normalized difference vegetation index, slope, curve number, topographic wetness index (TWI) and rainfall. RF was the best performing model with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.968 and an F1-score of 0.92, demonstrating its high performance and robustness in flood susceptibility analysis. In addition, RF, combined with SHAP, provided both robust and interpretable results. The study found that DTRiver, TWI, DTRoad, and slope had the highest influence on model predictions, while curve number had the least. RF classified the area into five flood susceptibility classes: very high (6%), high (9.6%), moderate (15.1%), low (26.6%), and very low (42.7%), accurately reflecting environmental and geo-topographic conditions. Based on these findings, mitigation measures can be designed to reduce flood risk in the Nyabarongo catchment. Additionally, the models have potential for application across Rwanda to improve flood susceptibility management and could be adapted for use globally.

Geomatics Natural Hazards and RiskVol. 16(1)
Lund University (SE), University of Kigali (RW), University of Rwanda (RW), Environmental and Water Resources Engineering (IL), Ecosystem Sciences (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.