From Weberian Rationalization to JavaScript Components

This paper considers modular approaches to building library software and situates these practices within the context of the rationalizing logics of modern programming. It briefly traces modularism through its elaboration in the social sciences, in computer science and ultimately describes it as it is deployed in contemporary academic libraries. Using the methodology of a case study, we consider some of the very tangible and pragmatic benefits of a modular approach, while also touching upon some of the broader implications. We find that the modularism is deeply integrated into modern software practice, and that it can help support the work of academic librarians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Technology and Libraries
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v44i3.17357
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Weberian Rationalization to JavaScript Components

Mark Eaton
Information Technology and Libraries
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

From Weberian Rationalization to JavaScript Components

Mark Eaton
article en

Abstract

This paper considers modular approaches to building library software and situates these practices within the context of the rationalizing logics of modern programming. It briefly traces modularism through its elaboration in the social sciences, in computer science and ultimately describes it as it is deployed in contemporary academic libraries. Using the methodology of a case study, we consider some of the very tangible and pragmatic benefits of a modular approach, while also touching upon some of the broader implications. We find that the modularism is deeply integrated into modern software practice, and that it can help support the work of academic librarians.

Information Technology and LibrariesVol. 44(3)
City University of New York (US), Kingsborough Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.