Authoritarian Drift, Variegated Paths: Mapping Administrative Transformation Strategies Under Illiberal Rule

ABSTRACT This article develops a typology of illiberal rule by identifying four distinct models of administrative transformation: neoauthoritarian, neopatrimonial, neoreactionary, and neoclientelist. Drawing on cases including Viktor Orbán, Donald Trump, Javier Milei, and Andrés Manuel López Obrador, it argues that illiberal leaders reshape bureaucracies through diverse strategies of control, each rooted in specific conceptions of the state and particular modes of bureaucratic design. In light of the varying illiberal trajectories, the article concludes by proposing differentiated reform strategies tailored to the specific threats posed by each variant of illiberal rule, aiming to bolster bureaucratic resilience accordingly. The analysis calls for a reorientation of public administration theory—from a focus on compliance to a normative conception of civil servants as stewards of democratic order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70028
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authoritarian Drift, Variegated Paths: Mapping Administrative Transformation Strategies Under Illiberal Rule

Michael W. Bauer
6 citations
Public Administration Review
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
25.21
article

Authoritarian Drift, Variegated Paths: Mapping Administrative Transformation Strategies Under Illiberal Rule

Michael W. Bauer
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article develops a typology of illiberal rule by identifying four distinct models of administrative transformation: neoauthoritarian, neopatrimonial, neoreactionary, and neoclientelist. Drawing on cases including Viktor Orbán, Donald Trump, Javier Milei, and Andrés Manuel López Obrador, it argues that illiberal leaders reshape bureaucracies through diverse strategies of control, each rooted in specific conceptions of the state and particular modes of bureaucratic design. In light of the varying illiberal trajectories, the article concludes by proposing differentiated reform strategies tailored to the specific threats posed by each variant of illiberal rule, aiming to bolster bureaucratic resilience accordingly. The analysis calls for a reorientation of public administration theory—from a focus on compliance to a normative conception of civil servants as stewards of democratic order.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(6)
European University Institute (IT)
European University Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.