The Impacts Are Correlated Between Single-leg Drop Landing And Running Landing

Single-leg drop landing was adopted to examine landing technique for lower-limb injury prevention in many exercises [1-2]. Besides the periodic feature, running also shows similar landing movements. PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the potential connection of the impact between single-leg drop landing and running landing. METHODS: 20 healthy adults performed single-leg drop landing with their dominant leg from a 30-cm box and run 50 m at their preferred speed (3.16-3.49 m/s) on four surfaces: concrete road (CR), synthetic rubber (SR), artificial grass (AG) and natural grass (NG). An inertial sensor was attached in the middle of the tibia of the dominant leg and peak tibial axial acceleration (PTA) was recorded to quantify the landing impact when performing the two tasks. RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was detected in PTA between the drop landing and running landing, and the model of predicting PTA during running (PTAdrop) based on the drop landing (PTArun) is: PTArun = 0.9728*PTAdrop + 23.09, (R2 = 0.6305; p < 0.0001). Regarding different surfaces, PTArun_CR = 1.257*PTAdrop_CR + 2.869, (R2 = 0.6314) for CR surface, PTArun_SR = 0.8708*PTAdrop_SR + 27.15, (R2 = 0.6481) for SR surface, PTArun_AG = 0.8836*PTAdrop_AG + 25.79, (R2 = 0.7011) for AG surface, and PTArun_NG = 1.113*PTAdrop_NG + 20.28, (R2 = 0.6739) for NG surface. CONCLUSION: The landing peak impact during running was highly correlated to that of the drop landing, which is robust to the landing surface. Similar motor control strategies may be adopted when one performs single-leg drop landing and running landing. Further studies are required to verify such explanations in the future. Fig 1. PTA between single-leg drop and running landings. Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (P.Z.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.). REFERNCES:[1] Wernli et al. 2016. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 46(3), 194-9.[2] Hung Au et al. 2021. J Athl Train, 56(12), 1362-6. Supported by: Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (P.Z.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001156312.66455.bd
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impacts Are Correlated Between Single-leg Drop Landing And Running Landing

Shiwei Mo, Pengfei Zheng, Li Li
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

The Impacts Are Correlated Between Single-leg Drop Landing And Running Landing

Shiwei Mo, Pengfei Zheng, Li Li
article en

Abstract

Single-leg drop landing was adopted to examine landing technique for lower-limb injury prevention in many exercises [1-2]. Besides the periodic feature, running also shows similar landing movements. PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the potential connection of the impact between single-leg drop landing and running landing. METHODS: 20 healthy adults performed single-leg drop landing with their dominant leg from a 30-cm box and run 50 m at their preferred speed (3.16-3.49 m/s) on four surfaces: concrete road (CR), synthetic rubber (SR), artificial grass (AG) and natural grass (NG). An inertial sensor was attached in the middle of the tibia of the dominant leg and peak tibial axial acceleration (PTA) was recorded to quantify the landing impact when performing the two tasks. RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was detected in PTA between the drop landing and running landing, and the model of predicting PTA during running (PTAdrop) based on the drop landing (PTArun) is: PTArun = 0.9728*PTAdrop + 23.09, (R2 = 0.6305; p < 0.0001). Regarding different surfaces, PTArun_CR = 1.257*PTAdrop_CR + 2.869, (R2 = 0.6314) for CR surface, PTArun_SR = 0.8708*PTAdrop_SR + 27.15, (R2 = 0.6481) for SR surface, PTArun_AG = 0.8836*PTAdrop_AG + 25.79, (R2 = 0.7011) for AG surface, and PTArun_NG = 1.113*PTAdrop_NG + 20.28, (R2 = 0.6739) for NG surface. CONCLUSION: The landing peak impact during running was highly correlated to that of the drop landing, which is robust to the landing surface. Similar motor control strategies may be adopted when one performs single-leg drop landing and running landing. Further studies are required to verify such explanations in the future. Fig 1. PTA between single-leg drop and running landings. Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (P.Z.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.). REFERNCES:[1] Wernli et al. 2016. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 46(3), 194-9.[2] Hung Au et al. 2021. J Athl Train, 56(12), 1362-6. Supported by: Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (P.Z.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Shenzhen University (CN), Georgia Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.