Impact Of Lower Extremity Injury History On Countermovement Jump Kinetics And Tissue Thickness

A history of injury has consistently been identified as a risk of future injury. Understanding biomechanical differences between cohorts with a history of lower extremity injury and those without may be valuable in avoiding subsequent injuries. To best translate to athletic populations, a kinetic assessment of countermovement jumps provides insight into performance indicators and injury risk factors in one task. Further insight can be provided through sonographic images and understanding tissue thickness as a sign of maladaptation. PURPOSE: To identify differences in jump kinetics during takeoff and landing events between cohorts with and without a history of injury, along with determining differences in plantar fascial and achilles tendon thickness. METHODS: Participants with a history of injury to the lower leg were recruited (n = 19, 169 ± 7 cm, 65 ± 12 kg, 22 ± 1 yrs, 240 ± 80 min/week). Healthy controls (n = 19, 169 ± 6 cm, 66 ± 8 kg, 23 ± 2 yrs, 230 ± 80 min/week) were then matched for physical activity and age. All participants completed three countermovement jumps at maximal effort, during which vertical ground reaction force was collected via a force platform (1000 Hz). The tissue thickness of the plantar fascia and achilles tendon was imaged using a portable diagnostic ultrasound machine. Independent t-tests and Hedge’s g effect size were used to determine the significance of cohort comparisons and their clinical value. RESULTS: Participants jumped the same height with (26 ± 6 cm) and without (24 ± 4 cm) a history of injury. Differences were identified in the rate of force development during the propulsive phase (p = 0.04, g = 0.67), where those with a history of injury produced force at a lower rate (No History of Injury: 21.7 ± 4.8 BW/s, History of Injury: 18.2 ± 5.4 BW/s); representing a 16% reduction. No differences were noted between cohorts for either tissue thickness (p ≥ 0.21). CONCLUSION: The present data does not demonstrate a different movement strategy for jumping in those with a history of lower extremity injury; however, a lower rate of force development during a countermovement jump may indicate a need for more time to generate the same relative force. Further, thicker tissue was not found in persons with a history of injury.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001156280.80799.4f
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Of Lower Extremity Injury History On Countermovement Jump Kinetics And Tissue Thickness

Shane P. Murphy, Kayla J. Lass
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Impact Of Lower Extremity Injury History On Countermovement Jump Kinetics And Tissue Thickness

Shane P. Murphy, Kayla J. Lass
article en

Abstract

A history of injury has consistently been identified as a risk of future injury. Understanding biomechanical differences between cohorts with a history of lower extremity injury and those without may be valuable in avoiding subsequent injuries. To best translate to athletic populations, a kinetic assessment of countermovement jumps provides insight into performance indicators and injury risk factors in one task. Further insight can be provided through sonographic images and understanding tissue thickness as a sign of maladaptation. PURPOSE: To identify differences in jump kinetics during takeoff and landing events between cohorts with and without a history of injury, along with determining differences in plantar fascial and achilles tendon thickness. METHODS: Participants with a history of injury to the lower leg were recruited (n = 19, 169 ± 7 cm, 65 ± 12 kg, 22 ± 1 yrs, 240 ± 80 min/week). Healthy controls (n = 19, 169 ± 6 cm, 66 ± 8 kg, 23 ± 2 yrs, 230 ± 80 min/week) were then matched for physical activity and age. All participants completed three countermovement jumps at maximal effort, during which vertical ground reaction force was collected via a force platform (1000 Hz). The tissue thickness of the plantar fascia and achilles tendon was imaged using a portable diagnostic ultrasound machine. Independent t-tests and Hedge’s g effect size were used to determine the significance of cohort comparisons and their clinical value. RESULTS: Participants jumped the same height with (26 ± 6 cm) and without (24 ± 4 cm) a history of injury. Differences were identified in the rate of force development during the propulsive phase (p = 0.04, g = 0.67), where those with a history of injury produced force at a lower rate (No History of Injury: 21.7 ± 4.8 BW/s, History of Injury: 18.2 ± 5.4 BW/s); representing a 16% reduction. No differences were noted between cohorts for either tissue thickness (p ≥ 0.21). CONCLUSION: The present data does not demonstrate a different movement strategy for jumping in those with a history of lower extremity injury; however, a lower rate of force development during a countermovement jump may indicate a need for more time to generate the same relative force. Further, thicker tissue was not found in persons with a history of injury.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.