<Non-linear Change Of Foot Morphology And Foot Arch Integrity With External Load>

The human feet enable efficient impact absorptions and push-offs in weight-bearing exercises (i.e., walking or running) through foot deformation, particularly the medial longitudinal foot arch. Yet, no studies investigate the relationship between foot deformation and external load, leading to a limited understanding of the material properties of the inter-metatarsal tissues and the mobility of the metatarsals. PURPOSE: To explore how foot morphology and arch integrity change with external loads. METHODS: Twenty healthy females (18.8 ± 0.9 years old, 162.6 ± 4.1 cm and 47.9 ± 3.2 kg) voluntarily took 3D foot scans under five bodyweight (BW) conditions: 0.1BW (sitting posture), 0.5BW (bilateral foot standing), 1.0BW (single foot standing), 1.5BW (single foot standing with 0.5BW weight) and 2.0BW (single foot standing with 1.0BW weight). Foot morphology and foot arch (shape and stiffness) variables were measured and calculated from 20 feet for each condition. One-way ANOVA tests and linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Significant differences were detected in foot width (p = 0.013) and hallux height (p < 0.001) but without statistical differences among 0.5BW, 1.0BW, 1.5BW and 2.0BW. All the foot arch variables showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.002) but differences for variables except the arch stiffness index were not found among 1.0BW, 1.5BW and 2.0BW. Generally, it showed an exponential increase or decrease with an increase in external load. CONCLUSION: The foot and foot arch deformed nonlinearly with an increase in external load, and the deformation reached an apex at around an individual’s body weight. Table 1. - Values of foot morphology and arch variables under different bodyweight (BW) conditions. Variables Loading Weight 0.1BW 0.5BW 1.0BW 1.5BW 2.0BW Foot Morphology (mm) Foot length 226.5±7.9 229.9±7.8 230.0±7.1 230.5±7.4 231.1±7.3 Truncated foot length 163.1±5.7 165.6±5.6 165.7±5.1 166.0±5.3 166.5±5.2 Foot width* 88.8±3.4 90.8±3.8 91.8±3.8 92.3±3.8† 92.4±3.6† Hallux height* 25.6±2.4 22.8±2.0† 22.1±1.7† 21.9±1.8† 22.0±1.7† Medial ankle condyle height* 77.1±4.7 71.4±4.1† 70.7±4.2† 70.2±3.8† 69.4±4.2† Ball girth 217.8±7.8 219.8±8.2 220.7±7.8 220.9±7.9 220.7±7.4 Tarsal girth 214.5±6.3 215.8±5.5 215.5±5.4 215.6±5.2 215.7±5.1 Foot Arch Arch height (mm)* 12.8±2.5 8.8±2.4† 7.9±2.2† 7.5±2.5† 6.7±2.0†‡ Dorsum height (mm)* 63.5±3.0 59.7±3.2† 59.6±2.8† 57.7±3.0† 58.1±3.1† Navicular height (mm)* 40.1±4.0 35.1±3.3† 37.2±3.3 36.6±3.4† 36.6±3.1† Medial arch angle (°)* 140.0±5.5 138.8±4.3 143.8±4.1‡ 141.9±3.9 143.3±4.6‡ Arch height index* 0.393±0.025 0.363±0.025† 0.362±0.021† 0.357±0.022† 0.352±0.023† Arch stiffness index* 1.0 0.940±0.018† 0.938±0.019† 0.925±0.022† 0.915±0.022†‡^ Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (X.L.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.). Supported by: Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (X.L.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161240.51514.fb
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

<Non-linear Change Of Foot Morphology And Foot Arch Integrity With External Load>

Xin Lai, Zhide Zhang, Shiwei Mo, Nan Liu et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

<Non-linear Change Of Foot Morphology And Foot Arch Integrity With External Load>

Xin Lai, Zhide Zhang, Shiwei Mo, Nan Liu, Li Li
article en

Abstract

The human feet enable efficient impact absorptions and push-offs in weight-bearing exercises (i.e., walking or running) through foot deformation, particularly the medial longitudinal foot arch. Yet, no studies investigate the relationship between foot deformation and external load, leading to a limited understanding of the material properties of the inter-metatarsal tissues and the mobility of the metatarsals. PURPOSE: To explore how foot morphology and arch integrity change with external loads. METHODS: Twenty healthy females (18.8 ± 0.9 years old, 162.6 ± 4.1 cm and 47.9 ± 3.2 kg) voluntarily took 3D foot scans under five bodyweight (BW) conditions: 0.1BW (sitting posture), 0.5BW (bilateral foot standing), 1.0BW (single foot standing), 1.5BW (single foot standing with 0.5BW weight) and 2.0BW (single foot standing with 1.0BW weight). Foot morphology and foot arch (shape and stiffness) variables were measured and calculated from 20 feet for each condition. One-way ANOVA tests and linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Significant differences were detected in foot width (p = 0.013) and hallux height (p < 0.001) but without statistical differences among 0.5BW, 1.0BW, 1.5BW and 2.0BW. All the foot arch variables showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.002) but differences for variables except the arch stiffness index were not found among 1.0BW, 1.5BW and 2.0BW. Generally, it showed an exponential increase or decrease with an increase in external load. CONCLUSION: The foot and foot arch deformed nonlinearly with an increase in external load, and the deformation reached an apex at around an individual’s body weight. Table 1. - Values of foot morphology and arch variables under different bodyweight (BW) conditions. Variables Loading Weight 0.1BW 0.5BW 1.0BW 1.5BW 2.0BW Foot Morphology (mm) Foot length 226.5±7.9 229.9±7.8 230.0±7.1 230.5±7.4 231.1±7.3 Truncated foot length 163.1±5.7 165.6±5.6 165.7±5.1 166.0±5.3 166.5±5.2 Foot width* 88.8±3.4 90.8±3.8 91.8±3.8 92.3±3.8† 92.4±3.6† Hallux height* 25.6±2.4 22.8±2.0† 22.1±1.7† 21.9±1.8† 22.0±1.7† Medial ankle condyle height* 77.1±4.7 71.4±4.1† 70.7±4.2† 70.2±3.8† 69.4±4.2† Ball girth 217.8±7.8 219.8±8.2 220.7±7.8 220.9±7.9 220.7±7.4 Tarsal girth 214.5±6.3 215.8±5.5 215.5±5.4 215.6±5.2 215.7±5.1 Foot Arch Arch height (mm)* 12.8±2.5 8.8±2.4† 7.9±2.2† 7.5±2.5† 6.7±2.0†‡ Dorsum height (mm)* 63.5±3.0 59.7±3.2† 59.6±2.8† 57.7±3.0† 58.1±3.1† Navicular height (mm)* 40.1±4.0 35.1±3.3† 37.2±3.3 36.6±3.4† 36.6±3.1† Medial arch angle (°)* 140.0±5.5 138.8±4.3 143.8±4.1‡ 141.9±3.9 143.3±4.6‡ Arch height index* 0.393±0.025 0.363±0.025† 0.362±0.021† 0.357±0.022† 0.352±0.023† Arch stiffness index* 1.0 0.940±0.018† 0.938±0.019† 0.925±0.022† 0.915±0.022†‡^ Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (X.L.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.). Supported by: Supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Projects for Shenzhen University Students (X.L.) and the China Scholarship Council (S.M.).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Shenzhen University (CN), Georgia Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.