Hidden traces: Writing sociologists’ wives into existence

In this article we draw on our investigation of the un- and under-acknowledged contributions of major post-war sociologists’ wives to the development of the discipline in the post-war period, as well as others’ accounts of recovering wives of academics from obscurity. In the first part of the article we show how legitimisations of wives’ invisibility are sustained through an essentially empiricist approach to evidence of their intellectual endeavours, alongside the gendered politics of the intellectual great man narrative and of the institutionalised status of wifehood. The second part is a retrospective reflection on why and how researchers are enabled to write the wives’ involvement into existence using slivers and scrappy traces of their presence and contributions. We argue that feminist relational sensibility comprises a critical edge: reading against the grain as well as with it, and paying conceptual not just empiricist attention to the wider social, economic and political conditions of institutional and interpersonal power relations of post-war wifehood. The lens of these broader gendered relations enables informed analysis and plausible interpretations of the contributions of the wives of influential sociologists to disciplinary knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Sociological Review
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261251375423
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden traces: Writing sociologists’ wives into existence

Rosalind Edwards, Val Gillies
1 citations
The Sociological Review
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
4.20
article

Hidden traces: Writing sociologists’ wives into existence

Rosalind Edwards, Val Gillies
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article we draw on our investigation of the un- and under-acknowledged contributions of major post-war sociologists’ wives to the development of the discipline in the post-war period, as well as others’ accounts of recovering wives of academics from obscurity. In the first part of the article we show how legitimisations of wives’ invisibility are sustained through an essentially empiricist approach to evidence of their intellectual endeavours, alongside the gendered politics of the intellectual great man narrative and of the institutionalised status of wifehood. The second part is a retrospective reflection on why and how researchers are enabled to write the wives’ involvement into existence using slivers and scrappy traces of their presence and contributions. We argue that feminist relational sensibility comprises a critical edge: reading against the grain as well as with it, and paying conceptual not just empiricist attention to the wider social, economic and political conditions of institutional and interpersonal power relations of post-war wifehood. The lens of these broader gendered relations enables informed analysis and plausible interpretations of the contributions of the wives of influential sociologists to disciplinary knowledge.

The Sociological Review
University of Southampton (GB), University of Westminster (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.