Anticipating uncertainty in infrastructure LCC, LCA, and S-LCA: A systematic, context-aware early identification framework

Uncertainty undermines the reliability of Life Cycle Costing (LCC), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) in Infrastructure Asset Management (IAM). Many methods for uncertainty analysis exist, but practitioners often lack systematic guidance to anticipate how uncertainties will unfold in specific assessments and thereby how to manage them. We propose a pre-emptive framework that anchors uncertainty analysis in the shared modelling structure of product systems, processes, and flows, making it transferable across the three methodologies. The framework links assessment context to uncertainty through three profiling indicators—instance count, intensity level, and prospective needs—and eleven infrastructure-specific dimensions that shape them. Mapping these dimensions across IAM decision-making levels illustrates how uncertainty escalates in the assessment contexts in which individual studies are embedded. A practitioner's checklist translates the framework into an early uncertainty profiling tool, guiding analysts to target rigorous modelling and quantification where it matters most. The discussion highlights the critical interdependencies between dimensions and identifies prospective needs as the dominant driver of uncertainty. Ultimately, by making uncertainty profiles explicit up front, the framework fosters proportionate, transparent, and context-responsive uncertainty analysis practices. The paper concludes by underscoring the need for future research into methodology-specific uncertainty modelling and quantification methods—especially for S-LCA—and how to formally and explicitly link their use to different uncertainty profiles to support designing LCT studies that account for individual uncertainty needs from the start. • Uncertainty propagates across model, datasets, and quantity modelling data and choices. • Eleven dimensions shape uncertainty profiles in infrastructure LCC, LCA and S-LCA. • Early uncertainty profiling fosters efficient preemptive analysis practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108175
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticipating uncertainty in infrastructure LCC, LCA, and S-LCA: A systematic, context-aware early identification framework

João Filipe Santos, Andreas Hartmann, Irina Stipanović, Andrea Vargas-Farias
1 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
0.95
article

Anticipating uncertainty in infrastructure LCC, LCA, and S-LCA: A systematic, context-aware early identification framework

João Filipe Santos, Andreas Hartmann, Irina Stipanović, Andrea Vargas-Farias
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Uncertainty undermines the reliability of Life Cycle Costing (LCC), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) in Infrastructure Asset Management (IAM). Many methods for uncertainty analysis exist, but practitioners often lack systematic guidance to anticipate how uncertainties will unfold in specific assessments and thereby how to manage them. We propose a pre-emptive framework that anchors uncertainty analysis in the shared modelling structure of product systems, processes, and flows, making it transferable across the three methodologies. The framework links assessment context to uncertainty through three profiling indicators—instance count, intensity level, and prospective needs—and eleven infrastructure-specific dimensions that shape them. Mapping these dimensions across IAM decision-making levels illustrates how uncertainty escalates in the assessment contexts in which individual studies are embedded. A practitioner's checklist translates the framework into an early uncertainty profiling tool, guiding analysts to target rigorous modelling and quantification where it matters most. The discussion highlights the critical interdependencies between dimensions and identifies prospective needs as the dominant driver of uncertainty. Ultimately, by making uncertainty profiles explicit up front, the framework fosters proportionate, transparent, and context-responsive uncertainty analysis practices. The paper concludes by underscoring the need for future research into methodology-specific uncertainty modelling and quantification methods—especially for S-LCA—and how to formally and explicitly link their use to different uncertainty profiles to support designing LCT studies that account for individual uncertainty needs from the start. • Uncertainty propagates across model, datasets, and quantity modelling data and choices. • Eleven dimensions shape uncertainty profiles in infrastructure LCC, LCA and S-LCA. • Early uncertainty profiling fosters efficient preemptive analysis practices.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 117
University of Twente (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.