Magmatic-hydrothermal fingerprints in lode gold deposits: A case study of the Liushaogou deposit in the West Qinling Orogen, China

• The ore-forming fluids and materials in the Liushaogou deposit were primarily derived from magmatic sources. • Fluid immiscibility were the critical mechanisms for gold precipitation. • The Liushaogou deposit is predominantly of magmatic-hydrothermal origin. The genesis of gold deposits in the northern belt of the Western Qinling Orogen, hosting numerous world-class gold deposits, remains a contentious issue. The Liushaogou deposit in this region is a quartz vein-style gold deposit, which is strictly controlled by brittle faults, and along with weak silicification and sericitization. Five hydrothermal mineralization stages were identified, including barren quartz (stage I), pyrite-quartz (stage II), quartz-pyrite (stage III), quartz-polymetallic sulfides (stage IV), and quartz-carbonate (stage V). Fluid inclusions within stages I–IV quartz and stage V calcite were studied. Stage I fluids are typified by high temperatures (up to ∼400 °C) and medium to high salinity (8–40 wt% NaCl equiv.), with δ 18 O fluid values of 6.21–8.31 ‰, and δD values of −96.1 to −91.6 ‰, aligning with the characteristics of magmatic fluids. Subsequent stages (II-IV) fluids retain magmatic isotopic signatures, while stage V fluids record a shift toward meteoric water (δ 18 O fluid : −5.44 to −4.84 ‰; δD: −80.1 ‰ to −74.9 ‰), reflecting late-stage meteoric influx. Physicochemical conditions of the mineralization fluids were estimated to be near-neutral, relatively reduced, and H 2 S-rich, favoring the transportation of gold as hydrosulfide complexes. Fluid immiscibility and boiling are the primary mechanisms for gold precipitation. Sulfur isotopes (δ 34 S H2S : 4.9–7.9 ‰) in Liushaogou pyrites closely overlap Triassic magmatic rocks and regional magmatic-hydrothermal deposits, contrasting sharply with heterogeneous δ 34 S values (−28 ‰ to + 47 ‰) of Paleozoic sedimentary/metamorphic rocks. Homogenous Pb isotopic ratios ( 206 Pb/ 204 Pb: 18.225–18.596; 207 Pb/ 204 Pb: 15.623–15.722; 208 Pb/ 204 Pb: 38.368–39.115), which are comparable to those observed in Triassic magmatic rocks, further trace metals to Triassic magmas. The evidence presented here, in conjunction with the spatiotemporal links to Triassic intrusions and coeval Au-Mo-Cu mineralization, collectively point to the magmatic-hydrothermal origin of the Liushaogou deposit. This study emphasizes Triassic magmatism as a significant ore-forming process in the northern belt of the Western Qinling Orogen, with implications for targeting concealed intrusions and associated fault systems in regional exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106888
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magmatic-hydrothermal fingerprints in lode gold deposits: A case study of the Liushaogou deposit in the West Qinling Orogen, China

Zhaonian Zhang, Kaitong Liu, Weilong Li, Yilun Du et al.
1 citations
Ore Geology Reviews
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Magmatic-hydrothermal fingerprints in lode gold deposits: A case study of the Liushaogou deposit in the West Qinling Orogen, China

Zhaonian Zhang, Kaitong Liu, Weilong Li, Yilun Du, Yuanwei Wang, Yi Cao, Yulie Lou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The ore-forming fluids and materials in the Liushaogou deposit were primarily derived from magmatic sources. • Fluid immiscibility were the critical mechanisms for gold precipitation. • The Liushaogou deposit is predominantly of magmatic-hydrothermal origin. The genesis of gold deposits in the northern belt of the Western Qinling Orogen, hosting numerous world-class gold deposits, remains a contentious issue. The Liushaogou deposit in this region is a quartz vein-style gold deposit, which is strictly controlled by brittle faults, and along with weak silicification and sericitization. Five hydrothermal mineralization stages were identified, including barren quartz (stage I), pyrite-quartz (stage II), quartz-pyrite (stage III), quartz-polymetallic sulfides (stage IV), and quartz-carbonate (stage V). Fluid inclusions within stages I–IV quartz and stage V calcite were studied. Stage I fluids are typified by high temperatures (up to ∼400 °C) and medium to high salinity (8–40 wt% NaCl equiv.), with δ 18 O fluid values of 6.21–8.31 ‰, and δD values of −96.1 to −91.6 ‰, aligning with the characteristics of magmatic fluids. Subsequent stages (II-IV) fluids retain magmatic isotopic signatures, while stage V fluids record a shift toward meteoric water (δ 18 O fluid : −5.44 to −4.84 ‰; δD: −80.1 ‰ to −74.9 ‰), reflecting late-stage meteoric influx. Physicochemical conditions of the mineralization fluids were estimated to be near-neutral, relatively reduced, and H 2 S-rich, favoring the transportation of gold as hydrosulfide complexes. Fluid immiscibility and boiling are the primary mechanisms for gold precipitation. Sulfur isotopes (δ 34 S H2S : 4.9–7.9 ‰) in Liushaogou pyrites closely overlap Triassic magmatic rocks and regional magmatic-hydrothermal deposits, contrasting sharply with heterogeneous δ 34 S values (−28 ‰ to + 47 ‰) of Paleozoic sedimentary/metamorphic rocks. Homogenous Pb isotopic ratios ( 206 Pb/ 204 Pb: 18.225–18.596; 207 Pb/ 204 Pb: 15.623–15.722; 208 Pb/ 204 Pb: 38.368–39.115), which are comparable to those observed in Triassic magmatic rocks, further trace metals to Triassic magmas. The evidence presented here, in conjunction with the spatiotemporal links to Triassic intrusions and coeval Au-Mo-Cu mineralization, collectively point to the magmatic-hydrothermal origin of the Liushaogou deposit. This study emphasizes Triassic magmatism as a significant ore-forming process in the northern belt of the Western Qinling Orogen, with implications for targeting concealed intrusions and associated fault systems in regional exploration.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 186
China Geological Survey (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.