Post-neutron fragment distributions of 233U(nth,f) and how they are influenced by model ingredients and pre-neutron fragment distributions

Abstract The series of investigations focused on post-neutron fragment distributions, i.e. fractional and total independent yields (Y(Z,A p ), Y(A p )), isotonic yields of post neutron fragments (Y(N p )), kinetic energy distributions of secondary fragments (KE p ), and the various influences on them as well as of different correlations between pre- and post-neutron fragment quantities (performed for 235 U(n th ,f), 239 Pu(n th ,f) and 252 Cf(SF)) is ending now with a deeper investigation devoted to 233 U(n th ,f). This has involved comprehensive prompt emission calculations (performed with the DSE model code) by using reliable pre-neutron fragment distributions Y(A,TKE) (5 sets of experimental data and a calculated one) and two fragmentation ranges (deterministically constructed by using reliable sets of the charge polarization ΔZ(A) and rms(A) of the isobaric charge distribution). As TXE partitions, beside that based on modeling at scission, another one based this time on the so-called “experimental temperature ratio R T ” provided by a new method (without resorting to prompt emission model calculations for the fit of ν(A) data as other codes do) was employed. This study not only confirmed and strengthened the previously observed features of how the structures of Y(A p ) and Y(N p ) are influenced by model ingredients and Y(A,TKE) but also has revealed that the most significant influence on prompt emission and all post-neutron fragment distributions is that of the TXE partition. The good description of existing experimental data of Y(Z,A p ), Y(A p ), KE p (Z), KE p (A p ) for 233 U(n th ,f) by the DSE results obtained with the TXE partition based on modeling at scission and several Y(A,TKE) can be considered as an indirect validation of these Y(A,TKE) distributions of pre-neutron fragments. The sawtooth shape of the nice correlation between the excitation energy E* of fully accelerated pre-neutron fragments and KE p of post neutron fragments (looking as a reflection in mirror of the sawtooth shape of ν(A)) is maintained regardless of the employed fragmentation range, TXE partition and Y(A,TKE). The almost perfect overlap of E*(KE p ) in the case of 235, 233 U(n th ,f) (which might seem intuitive because the even-even compound nuclei 236, 234 U undergoing fission are close neighbors with similar nuclear properties) is explained in detail by investigating the beahviours of all physical quantities and distributions which are involved in this correlation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal A
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01662-x
Primary Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-neutron fragment distributions of 233U(nth,f) and how they are influenced by model ingredients and pre-neutron fragment distributions

Anabella Tudora
The European Physical Journal A
Nuclear physics research studies
article

Post-neutron fragment distributions of 233U(nth,f) and how they are influenced by model ingredients and pre-neutron fragment distributions

Anabella Tudora
article en

Abstract

Abstract The series of investigations focused on post-neutron fragment distributions, i.e. fractional and total independent yields (Y(Z,A p ), Y(A p )), isotonic yields of post neutron fragments (Y(N p )), kinetic energy distributions of secondary fragments (KE p ), and the various influences on them as well as of different correlations between pre- and post-neutron fragment quantities (performed for 235 U(n th ,f), 239 Pu(n th ,f) and 252 Cf(SF)) is ending now with a deeper investigation devoted to 233 U(n th ,f). This has involved comprehensive prompt emission calculations (performed with the DSE model code) by using reliable pre-neutron fragment distributions Y(A,TKE) (5 sets of experimental data and a calculated one) and two fragmentation ranges (deterministically constructed by using reliable sets of the charge polarization ΔZ(A) and rms(A) of the isobaric charge distribution). As TXE partitions, beside that based on modeling at scission, another one based this time on the so-called “experimental temperature ratio R T ” provided by a new method (without resorting to prompt emission model calculations for the fit of ν(A) data as other codes do) was employed. This study not only confirmed and strengthened the previously observed features of how the structures of Y(A p ) and Y(N p ) are influenced by model ingredients and Y(A,TKE) but also has revealed that the most significant influence on prompt emission and all post-neutron fragment distributions is that of the TXE partition. The good description of existing experimental data of Y(Z,A p ), Y(A p ), KE p (Z), KE p (A p ) for 233 U(n th ,f) by the DSE results obtained with the TXE partition based on modeling at scission and several Y(A,TKE) can be considered as an indirect validation of these Y(A,TKE) distributions of pre-neutron fragments. The sawtooth shape of the nice correlation between the excitation energy E* of fully accelerated pre-neutron fragments and KE p of post neutron fragments (looking as a reflection in mirror of the sawtooth shape of ν(A)) is maintained regardless of the employed fragmentation range, TXE partition and Y(A,TKE). The almost perfect overlap of E*(KE p ) in the case of 235, 233 U(n th ,f) (which might seem intuitive because the even-even compound nuclei 236, 234 U undergoing fission are close neighbors with similar nuclear properties) is explained in detail by investigating the beahviours of all physical quantities and distributions which are involved in this correlation.

The European Physical Journal AVol. 61(9)
University of Bucharest (RO)
International Atomic Energy Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Nuclear physics research studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.