Comparison of parametric model order reduction methods to solve magneto-quasistatic and electro-quasistatic problems

In this paper, we compare two parametric model order reduction methods, the multi-moment matching method and the interpolation of projection subspaces method for the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) and electro-quasistatic (EQS) problems derived from Maxwell’s equations and discretized with the Finite Element (FE) method. The two problems considered are both governed by the differential–algebraic equations. The material characteristic parameters as well as the geometry parameters have been considered. The applications are two realistic test cases: an EQS model of a transformer bushing under insulation defect uncertainty and a MQS model of a planar inductor with geometric and material variations. The result shows that both methods approximate well global quantities, such as the current or the voltage, as well as the local quantities like field distributions. The multi-moment matching method remains always faster in the online stage, since the reduced basis is not parameter dependent, requiring no reduced basis calculation. The multi-moment matching method requires an affine decomposition of the FE model, which is not easy to obtain when considering geometry parameters. A hybrid method is proposed and tested leading to more accurate results than the interpolation of projection subspaces method but much easier to implement than the multi-moment matching method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2025.104444
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of parametric model order reduction methods to solve magneto-quasistatic and electro-quasistatic problems

Thomas Henneron, S. Clénet, Wei Chen
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Comparison of parametric model order reduction methods to solve magneto-quasistatic and electro-quasistatic problems

Thomas Henneron, S. Clénet, Wei Chen
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we compare two parametric model order reduction methods, the multi-moment matching method and the interpolation of projection subspaces method for the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) and electro-quasistatic (EQS) problems derived from Maxwell’s equations and discretized with the Finite Element (FE) method. The two problems considered are both governed by the differential–algebraic equations. The material characteristic parameters as well as the geometry parameters have been considered. The applications are two realistic test cases: an EQS model of a transformer bushing under insulation defect uncertainty and a MQS model of a planar inductor with geometric and material variations. The result shows that both methods approximate well global quantities, such as the current or the voltage, as well as the local quantities like field distributions. The multi-moment matching method remains always faster in the online stage, since the reduced basis is not parameter dependent, requiring no reduced basis calculation. The multi-moment matching method requires an affine decomposition of the FE model, which is not easy to obtain when considering geometry parameters. A hybrid method is proposed and tested leading to more accurate results than the interpolation of projection subspaces method but much easier to implement than the multi-moment matching method.

Finite Elements in Analysis and DesignVol. 252
Université de Lille (FR), Laboratoire d'Électrotechnique et d'Électronique de Puissance de Lille (FR)
European Commission, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.