Validity Of Palpation To Measure Arterial Occlusion Pressure In The Upper And Lower Limb

For implementation of exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) it is recommended that cuff pressures be based on arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). However, clinicians, coaches, and athletes may not have access to the necessary equipment for directly assessing AOP (i.e., Doppler ultrasound, handheld Doppler). Palpation, a method of detecting blood flow by simply feeling the pulse with the fingers, could serve as a practical alternative to measuring AOP that would require no equipment. However, there is no data supporting the validity of this method. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of manual palpation to measure AOP in both the upper and lower limbs. METHODS: Nine normotensive healthy adults (age 25 ± 5) underwent measures of upper and lower-limb AOP in a supine position by applying a 5 cm and 12 cm wide pneumatic cuff to the upper and lower-limbs, respectively. For both limbs, AOP was assessed simultaneously via handheld Doppler and manual palpation by separate investigators at the radial and posterior tibial arteries. Investigators wore sound-canceling headphones and were visually blinded to one another. The degree of agreement between AOP values measured via Doppler and palpation was assessed using Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA). To statistically test the equivalence of values we utilized a two one-sided paired t-test (ɑ = 0.05) with an equivalence region equal to 10% of the mean Doppler AOP. RESULTS: In the upper-limb, the mean difference between palpation (155 ± 17 mmHg) and Doppler (167 ± 20 mmHg) AOP values was -2.8 mmHg. The upper and lower 95% LoA were 11.2 mmHg and -17.0 mmHg. Values obtained via Doppler and palpation were equivalent (p < 0.05). In the lower-limb, the mean difference between palpation (138 ± 11 mmHg) and Doppler (145 ± 14 mmHg) values was -7.3 mmHg. The upper and lower 95% LoA were 15.9 mmHg and -30.8 mmHg. Values obtained via Doppler and palpation were not equivalent (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that palpation is a valid way to measure AOP in the upper limbs. Palpation does not provide valid measures in the lower-limb, however, measures may still be practically acceptable for selecting exercising cuff pressures. Accordingly, arterial palpation allows for the implementation of exercise with BFR without the need for specialized equipment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161064.05599.16
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity Of Palpation To Measure Arterial Occlusion Pressure In The Upper And Lower Limb

Isaac J. Wedig, Declan B. Stratford, Eric P. Naugle, Jazz C. Taggs
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Validity Of Palpation To Measure Arterial Occlusion Pressure In The Upper And Lower Limb

Isaac J. Wedig, Declan B. Stratford, Eric P. Naugle, Jazz C. Taggs
article en

Abstract

For implementation of exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) it is recommended that cuff pressures be based on arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). However, clinicians, coaches, and athletes may not have access to the necessary equipment for directly assessing AOP (i.e., Doppler ultrasound, handheld Doppler). Palpation, a method of detecting blood flow by simply feeling the pulse with the fingers, could serve as a practical alternative to measuring AOP that would require no equipment. However, there is no data supporting the validity of this method. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of manual palpation to measure AOP in both the upper and lower limbs. METHODS: Nine normotensive healthy adults (age 25 ± 5) underwent measures of upper and lower-limb AOP in a supine position by applying a 5 cm and 12 cm wide pneumatic cuff to the upper and lower-limbs, respectively. For both limbs, AOP was assessed simultaneously via handheld Doppler and manual palpation by separate investigators at the radial and posterior tibial arteries. Investigators wore sound-canceling headphones and were visually blinded to one another. The degree of agreement between AOP values measured via Doppler and palpation was assessed using Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA). To statistically test the equivalence of values we utilized a two one-sided paired t-test (ɑ = 0.05) with an equivalence region equal to 10% of the mean Doppler AOP. RESULTS: In the upper-limb, the mean difference between palpation (155 ± 17 mmHg) and Doppler (167 ± 20 mmHg) AOP values was -2.8 mmHg. The upper and lower 95% LoA were 11.2 mmHg and -17.0 mmHg. Values obtained via Doppler and palpation were equivalent (p < 0.05). In the lower-limb, the mean difference between palpation (138 ± 11 mmHg) and Doppler (145 ± 14 mmHg) values was -7.3 mmHg. The upper and lower 95% LoA were 15.9 mmHg and -30.8 mmHg. Values obtained via Doppler and palpation were not equivalent (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that palpation is a valid way to measure AOP in the upper limbs. Palpation does not provide valid measures in the lower-limb, however, measures may still be practically acceptable for selecting exercising cuff pressures. Accordingly, arterial palpation allows for the implementation of exercise with BFR without the need for specialized equipment.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Northern Michigan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.