Between-visit Reproducibility Of Pain, Sympathetic, And Blood Pressure Responses During The Cold Pressor Test

Interindividual differences exist in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and blood pressure (BP) responses to the pain-evoking cold pressor test (CPT). One study examined between-visit reproducibility of MSNA (peroneal) and BP responses during the CPT, but did not measure pain perception in the 13 assessed adults. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis to examine the between-visit reproducibility of pain, BP, and MSNA responses during the CPT. PURPOSE: Based on past work we tested the hypothesis that reproducibility would be good for pain, very good for BP responses, and moderate for MSNA responses during the CPT. METHODS: During two experimental visits ≥48 hours apart, we continuously measured MSNA via radial microneurography and beat-to-beat BP via finger photoplethysmography during a 10-minute baseline and a 2-minute CPT (hand in 0.34 ± 0.05 °C ice bath). We assessed pain perception using a 10 cm visual analog scale. The left anchor [0 cm] was “no pain,” and the right anchor [10 cm] was “worst imaginable pain.” We calculated the changes in (Δ) MSNA and BP as CPT minute two minus baseline. We report data as mean ± SD or median [IQR] and calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: We tested 20 young adults (age = 30 ± 6 yrs; body mass index = 26 ± 3 kg/m2) who were free from overt disease and were not taking pain-modifying medications. Baseline mean BP had very good reproducibility (88 ± 8 mmHg; ICC = 0.78) and baseline MSNA burst frequency had moderate reproducibility (12[6] bursts/min; ICC = 0.41). During the CPT, perceived pain had excellent reproducibility (7.3[2.3] cm; ICC = 0.91), Δmean BP had good reproducibility (Δ19 ± 9; ICC = 0.71), and ΔMSNA burst frequency had poor reproducibility (Δ17[16] bursts/min; ICC = 0.14). ΔMSNA total activity had poor reproducibility before (325[394]% of baseline; ICC = -0.12) and moderate reproducibility after (325[379]% of baseline; ICC = 0.41) removing two statistical outliers (>3*IQR above median). CONCLUSION: These results suggest excellent reproducibility for pain, good reproducibility for Δmean BP, and poor-to-moderate reproducibility for ΔMSNA indices during the CPT. Since our results for ΔMSNA and Δmean BP differed from previous work, more research may be warranted to better understand the reproducibility of responses during the CPT. Supported by: LNB was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; F32HL154565). This research was supported by the United States Army (W81XWH-18-2-0012 to CGC). JCW was supported by the American Physiological Society (Postdoctoral Fellowship), the NIH (F32HL154559 & K01HL160772), and the American Heart Association (23CDA1037938).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001160500.94152.6a
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between-visit Reproducibility Of Pain, Sympathetic, And Blood Pressure Responses During The Cold Pressor Test

Caitlin P. Jarrard, Luke N. Belval, Mu Huang, Craig G. Crandall et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Between-visit Reproducibility Of Pain, Sympathetic, And Blood Pressure Responses During The Cold Pressor Test

Caitlin P. Jarrard, Luke N. Belval, Mu Huang, Craig G. Crandall, J Hoch, Joseph C. Watso
article en

Abstract

Interindividual differences exist in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and blood pressure (BP) responses to the pain-evoking cold pressor test (CPT). One study examined between-visit reproducibility of MSNA (peroneal) and BP responses during the CPT, but did not measure pain perception in the 13 assessed adults. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis to examine the between-visit reproducibility of pain, BP, and MSNA responses during the CPT. PURPOSE: Based on past work we tested the hypothesis that reproducibility would be good for pain, very good for BP responses, and moderate for MSNA responses during the CPT. METHODS: During two experimental visits ≥48 hours apart, we continuously measured MSNA via radial microneurography and beat-to-beat BP via finger photoplethysmography during a 10-minute baseline and a 2-minute CPT (hand in 0.34 ± 0.05 °C ice bath). We assessed pain perception using a 10 cm visual analog scale. The left anchor [0 cm] was “no pain,” and the right anchor [10 cm] was “worst imaginable pain.” We calculated the changes in (Δ) MSNA and BP as CPT minute two minus baseline. We report data as mean ± SD or median [IQR] and calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: We tested 20 young adults (age = 30 ± 6 yrs; body mass index = 26 ± 3 kg/m2) who were free from overt disease and were not taking pain-modifying medications. Baseline mean BP had very good reproducibility (88 ± 8 mmHg; ICC = 0.78) and baseline MSNA burst frequency had moderate reproducibility (12[6] bursts/min; ICC = 0.41). During the CPT, perceived pain had excellent reproducibility (7.3[2.3] cm; ICC = 0.91), Δmean BP had good reproducibility (Δ19 ± 9; ICC = 0.71), and ΔMSNA burst frequency had poor reproducibility (Δ17[16] bursts/min; ICC = 0.14). ΔMSNA total activity had poor reproducibility before (325[394]% of baseline; ICC = -0.12) and moderate reproducibility after (325[379]% of baseline; ICC = 0.41) removing two statistical outliers (>3*IQR above median). CONCLUSION: These results suggest excellent reproducibility for pain, good reproducibility for Δmean BP, and poor-to-moderate reproducibility for ΔMSNA indices during the CPT. Since our results for ΔMSNA and Δmean BP differed from previous work, more research may be warranted to better understand the reproducibility of responses during the CPT. Supported by: LNB was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; F32HL154565). This research was supported by the United States Army (W81XWH-18-2-0012 to CGC). JCW was supported by the American Physiological Society (Postdoctoral Fellowship), the NIH (F32HL154559 & K01HL160772), and the American Heart Association (23CDA1037938).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Florida State University (US), American Heart Association (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.