A Hanság és a Tóköz nedves rétjeinek jellemző vegetációtípusai

During our research, we set the goal of a phytocoenological survey of the wet meadows of Hanság and Tóköz. We conducted our studies in designated areas within three microregions, with a total area of 784.91 ha. A total of 299 coenological quadrats were established and surveyed. Based on these surveys, we determined the characteristic vegetation types occurring in the areas. A total of 17 pure, 21 hybrid and 11 degraded association types were identified. I classified the 299 surveys into three types, thus determining the types of fen meadows (112 surveys), high sedge meadows (115 surveys) and marsh meadows (72 surveys). Based on the evaluation of the surveys, it became clear that the association description of the study areas is difficult using the Hungarian system (cf. BORHIDI 2003). It turned out that associations showing transitional characteristics play a prominent role in the region, the definition of which is difficult. We encountered many vegetation types in the areas that could not be fitted into the above system, for which we were forced to create new names. During the on-site visits, we prepared sketches of vegetation maps and determined the association types occurring in the areas. We digitized the sketch maps and prepared vegetation maps of the studied areas. The association categories displayed on the vegetation maps number 67 types, all types occurring within the studied areas are indicated here, including those in which no coenological survey was made. We monitored the impact of the grassland management methods on the vegetation in the studied areas. We formulated proposals regarding the implementation of further treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magyar Vízivad Közlemények
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17242/mvvk_40.01
Primary Topic
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Hanság és a Tóköz nedves rétjeinek jellemző vegetációtípusai

Győző Haszonits
Magyar Vízivad Közlemények
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
article

A Hanság és a Tóköz nedves rétjeinek jellemző vegetációtípusai

Győző Haszonits
article en

Abstract

During our research, we set the goal of a phytocoenological survey of the wet meadows of Hanság and Tóköz. We conducted our studies in designated areas within three microregions, with a total area of 784.91 ha. A total of 299 coenological quadrats were established and surveyed. Based on these surveys, we determined the characteristic vegetation types occurring in the areas. A total of 17 pure, 21 hybrid and 11 degraded association types were identified. I classified the 299 surveys into three types, thus determining the types of fen meadows (112 surveys), high sedge meadows (115 surveys) and marsh meadows (72 surveys). Based on the evaluation of the surveys, it became clear that the association description of the study areas is difficult using the Hungarian system (cf. BORHIDI 2003). It turned out that associations showing transitional characteristics play a prominent role in the region, the definition of which is difficult. We encountered many vegetation types in the areas that could not be fitted into the above system, for which we were forced to create new names. During the on-site visits, we prepared sketches of vegetation maps and determined the association types occurring in the areas. We digitized the sketch maps and prepared vegetation maps of the studied areas. The association categories displayed on the vegetation maps number 67 types, all types occurring within the studied areas are indicated here, including those in which no coenological survey was made. We monitored the impact of the grassland management methods on the vegetation in the studied areas. We formulated proposals regarding the implementation of further treatments.

Magyar Vízivad Közlemények(40)
Institut Marcel Mauss (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.