Fencing Injuries Treated In US Emergency Departments

Fencing has sustained popularity among US athletes of all ages and a significant international presence. It is important to evaluate injuries sustained by fencers, an athlete population left largely unstudied in the present sports medicine literature. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of injuries of fencers presenting to the emergency department (ED) from 2013-2022, along with analyzing demographic trends, gender and age group disparities, and the most frequent injury patterns. METHODS: The US Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database was queried in January 2024 using the product code, 3260 - Fencing (activity/apparel/equipment). Variables included injury type, age, race, body part injured, primary and secondary diagnosis, and discharge disposition. Narrative descriptions were used to elucidate mechanisms of injury and re-classify patients with primary diagnosis of “Other”. Statistical tests were performed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS v29. RESULTS: From 2013-2022, 110 fencers presented to emergency departments. Most fencing injuries occurred in those 11-15 years old, followed by 16-20 years. More males than females experienced fencing injuries (59% v. 40.9%) (p < 0.05) and most patients were Caucasian (47.3%) (p < 0.001). Most injuries were to the finger (14.5%) and hand (8.2%) followed by the wrist (7.3%), then the head (7.3%). The most common injury was strain/sprain followed by laceration. Females had a higher fracture incidence than males (13.3% v. 9.2%) (p = 0.03). Males had a higher laceration incidence (21.50% v. 8.9%) (p < 0.001). Fencing injury incidence decreased during this period. The NEISS national estimate of total number of fencing-related injuries in US EDs during this period was 3402. CONCLUSIONS: Fencers experience significant injuries. In this study, most patients were teenagers, suggesting that research focus should be directed toward younger athletes and how to reduce fencing-related trauma. Gender disparities in injury patterns warrant additional inquiry. The decrease in overall injury incidence demonstrates that the preventative measures made by the sport over the past 9 years have made a positive impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001158748.86568.86
Primary Topic
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fencing Injuries Treated In US Emergency Departments

Balazs Galdi, Kamali Thompson, Ariana L. Shaari, Brooke Stanicki et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
article

Fencing Injuries Treated In US Emergency Departments

Balazs Galdi, Kamali Thompson, Ariana L. Shaari, Brooke Stanicki, Jaynie X Criscione
article en

Abstract

Fencing has sustained popularity among US athletes of all ages and a significant international presence. It is important to evaluate injuries sustained by fencers, an athlete population left largely unstudied in the present sports medicine literature. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of injuries of fencers presenting to the emergency department (ED) from 2013-2022, along with analyzing demographic trends, gender and age group disparities, and the most frequent injury patterns. METHODS: The US Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database was queried in January 2024 using the product code, 3260 - Fencing (activity/apparel/equipment). Variables included injury type, age, race, body part injured, primary and secondary diagnosis, and discharge disposition. Narrative descriptions were used to elucidate mechanisms of injury and re-classify patients with primary diagnosis of “Other”. Statistical tests were performed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS v29. RESULTS: From 2013-2022, 110 fencers presented to emergency departments. Most fencing injuries occurred in those 11-15 years old, followed by 16-20 years. More males than females experienced fencing injuries (59% v. 40.9%) (p < 0.05) and most patients were Caucasian (47.3%) (p < 0.001). Most injuries were to the finger (14.5%) and hand (8.2%) followed by the wrist (7.3%), then the head (7.3%). The most common injury was strain/sprain followed by laceration. Females had a higher fracture incidence than males (13.3% v. 9.2%) (p = 0.03). Males had a higher laceration incidence (21.50% v. 8.9%) (p < 0.001). Fencing injury incidence decreased during this period. The NEISS national estimate of total number of fencing-related injuries in US EDs during this period was 3402. CONCLUSIONS: Fencers experience significant injuries. In this study, most patients were teenagers, suggesting that research focus should be directed toward younger athletes and how to reduce fencing-related trauma. Gender disparities in injury patterns warrant additional inquiry. The decrease in overall injury incidence demonstrates that the preventative measures made by the sport over the past 9 years have made a positive impact.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of South Florida (US), Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.