The Evaluation Of On-ice Incremental Test (OIST): A New Aerobic Capacity Test For Speed Skaters

Speed skating, particularly in long-distance events, requires significant aerobic capacity. Traditional aerobic tests, such as cycling on ergometers, fail to capture the unique biomechanics and low-temperature conditions of on-ice performance. Thus, an on-ice incremental skating test (OIST) was developed to better assess aerobic capacity under realistic conditions. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the OIST compared to laboratory-based aerobic tests. METHODS: A total of 70 speed skaters aged 14-25 participated in the study, with 62 completing both the laboratory-based cycling test and the OIST on consecutive days. Athletes performed a cycling test on a Monark ergometer and an OIST over two consecutive days. Ventilation, heart rate, and oxygen uptake (VO2) were recorded using portable gas analyzers. Additionally, 16 athletes underwent a retest of the OIST without analyzers to examine reliability. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, correlation coefficients, and equivalence testing, were applied to compare results between tests. RESULTS: OIST demonstrated high reliability with no significant differences in skating performance between tests with and without gas analyzers (p > 0.05). VO2max values from the OIST were significantly lower than those from the laboratory test (3.04 ± 0.48 L/min vs. 3.56 ± 0.68 L/min, p < 0.001), but there was a strong correlation (r = 0.779, p < 0.001). Additionally, the OIST showed high discriminant validity, with significant differences between first-level and national-level athletes (p = 0.011). Correlations between aerobic indicators and athletic performance were higher in OIST compared to the laboratory test, particularly for long-distance events like the 5000 m (r = 0.849 for VO2 max velocity). The equivalence testing proved that the RER method could be an alternative method to estimate VT in OIST when the equivalent margin is 7% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The OIST is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool for assessing aerobic capacity in speed skaters. It addresses the limitations of laboratory-based tests by providing a more sport-specific and ecologically valid assessment, making it valuable for both training and performance evaluations. Supported by: National Key R&D Program of China, grant number 2018YFF0300401.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157272.05721.87
Primary Topic
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evaluation Of On-ice Incremental Test (OIST): A New Aerobic Capacity Test For Speed Skaters

Mingyue Zhang
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
article

The Evaluation Of On-ice Incremental Test (OIST): A New Aerobic Capacity Test For Speed Skaters

Mingyue Zhang
article en

Abstract

Speed skating, particularly in long-distance events, requires significant aerobic capacity. Traditional aerobic tests, such as cycling on ergometers, fail to capture the unique biomechanics and low-temperature conditions of on-ice performance. Thus, an on-ice incremental skating test (OIST) was developed to better assess aerobic capacity under realistic conditions. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the OIST compared to laboratory-based aerobic tests. METHODS: A total of 70 speed skaters aged 14-25 participated in the study, with 62 completing both the laboratory-based cycling test and the OIST on consecutive days. Athletes performed a cycling test on a Monark ergometer and an OIST over two consecutive days. Ventilation, heart rate, and oxygen uptake (VO2) were recorded using portable gas analyzers. Additionally, 16 athletes underwent a retest of the OIST without analyzers to examine reliability. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, correlation coefficients, and equivalence testing, were applied to compare results between tests. RESULTS: OIST demonstrated high reliability with no significant differences in skating performance between tests with and without gas analyzers (p > 0.05). VO2max values from the OIST were significantly lower than those from the laboratory test (3.04 ± 0.48 L/min vs. 3.56 ± 0.68 L/min, p < 0.001), but there was a strong correlation (r = 0.779, p < 0.001). Additionally, the OIST showed high discriminant validity, with significant differences between first-level and national-level athletes (p = 0.011). Correlations between aerobic indicators and athletic performance were higher in OIST compared to the laboratory test, particularly for long-distance events like the 5000 m (r = 0.849 for VO2 max velocity). The equivalence testing proved that the RER method could be an alternative method to estimate VT in OIST when the equivalent margin is 7% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The OIST is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool for assessing aerobic capacity in speed skaters. It addresses the limitations of laboratory-based tests by providing a more sport-specific and ecologically valid assessment, making it valuable for both training and performance evaluations. Supported by: National Key R&D Program of China, grant number 2018YFF0300401.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.