Acute Sensory And Gastrointestinal Responses To Protein Intake Prior To Resistance Training

Muscle mass is an important variable for health, daily life and sports performance. Protein consumption throughout the day is often recommended to stimulate muscle mass synthesis. However, given that palatability and potential gastrointestinal symptoms (GIs) may be factors that influence voluntary intake, any protein-rich products recommended for exercisers must be viable, convenient, and pleasant. PURPOSE: To compare the palatability of two protein-rich products before starting resistance exercise and potential GIs that may arise during exercise after their consumption. METHODS: Twenty-five physically active subjects visited the laboratory on two occasions. During each visit, a protein-rich product was consumed (a 200 mL liquid Greek yogurt, 25 g protein; or a 500 mL milk, 24 g protein) before completing a standardized resistance-exercise session. Consumption time (CT) and six palatability aspects (1-9 scale) were assessed. 17 GIs were reported (0-9 scale) before and after product consumption, halfway through and at the end of each session. RESULTS: Products were not different in the palatability variables; overall acceptance was 7.64 ± 0.99 (mean ± SD) for yogurt and 7.84 ± 0.85 for milk (p = 0.134). CT was greater for milk (370.6 ± 289. 47 s) than yogurt (171.12 ± 81.84 s) (p ≤ 0.01). Most GIs were mild or moderate with no difference between products, ranging from 0-4. Most severe were thick saliva (0-9, min-max) with 1.25 ± 1.91 for yogurt and 1.17 ± 1.92 for milk (p > 0.05), and burping (0-9, min-max) with 1.01 ± 1.63 for yogurt and 1.41 ± 1.78 for milk (p > 0.05). Only nausea, thick saliva, burping, and intestinal cramps increased with time and similarly for milk and yogurt; the urge to urinate was higher for milk (0.49 ± 0.17; 0-3, min-max) than for yogurt (0.14 ± 0.10; 0-5, min-max) (p = 0.012). Finally, abdominal bloating increased over time with milk from 0.16 ± 0.47 (0-2, min-max) before product consumption to 1.08 ± 2.3 (0-9, min- max) at the end of the session, but not with yogurt (p = 0.01 for the interaction). CONCLUSION: Both products showed good acceptance and reasonable tolerance, hence they could be considered as options for protein intake before resistance training.Funded by Dos Pinos Milk Producers Coop. of Costa Rica under a cooperation agreement with University of Costa Rica for research project VI-838-C4-326.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155288.33278.8f
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute Sensory And Gastrointestinal Responses To Protein Intake Prior To Resistance Training

Julián Camilo Garzón Mosquera, Aragón Vargas, Priscilla Portuguez-Molina
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

Acute Sensory And Gastrointestinal Responses To Protein Intake Prior To Resistance Training

Julián Camilo Garzón Mosquera, Aragón Vargas, Priscilla Portuguez-Molina
article en

Abstract

Muscle mass is an important variable for health, daily life and sports performance. Protein consumption throughout the day is often recommended to stimulate muscle mass synthesis. However, given that palatability and potential gastrointestinal symptoms (GIs) may be factors that influence voluntary intake, any protein-rich products recommended for exercisers must be viable, convenient, and pleasant. PURPOSE: To compare the palatability of two protein-rich products before starting resistance exercise and potential GIs that may arise during exercise after their consumption. METHODS: Twenty-five physically active subjects visited the laboratory on two occasions. During each visit, a protein-rich product was consumed (a 200 mL liquid Greek yogurt, 25 g protein; or a 500 mL milk, 24 g protein) before completing a standardized resistance-exercise session. Consumption time (CT) and six palatability aspects (1-9 scale) were assessed. 17 GIs were reported (0-9 scale) before and after product consumption, halfway through and at the end of each session. RESULTS: Products were not different in the palatability variables; overall acceptance was 7.64 ± 0.99 (mean ± SD) for yogurt and 7.84 ± 0.85 for milk (p = 0.134). CT was greater for milk (370.6 ± 289. 47 s) than yogurt (171.12 ± 81.84 s) (p ≤ 0.01). Most GIs were mild or moderate with no difference between products, ranging from 0-4. Most severe were thick saliva (0-9, min-max) with 1.25 ± 1.91 for yogurt and 1.17 ± 1.92 for milk (p > 0.05), and burping (0-9, min-max) with 1.01 ± 1.63 for yogurt and 1.41 ± 1.78 for milk (p > 0.05). Only nausea, thick saliva, burping, and intestinal cramps increased with time and similarly for milk and yogurt; the urge to urinate was higher for milk (0.49 ± 0.17; 0-3, min-max) than for yogurt (0.14 ± 0.10; 0-5, min-max) (p = 0.012). Finally, abdominal bloating increased over time with milk from 0.16 ± 0.47 (0-2, min-max) before product consumption to 1.08 ± 2.3 (0-9, min- max) at the end of the session, but not with yogurt (p = 0.01 for the interaction). CONCLUSION: Both products showed good acceptance and reasonable tolerance, hence they could be considered as options for protein intake before resistance training.Funded by Dos Pinos Milk Producers Coop. of Costa Rica under a cooperation agreement with University of Costa Rica for research project VI-838-C4-326.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Universidad de Costa Rica (CR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.