Do Changes In Mental And Physical Energy And Fatigue Impact Changes On Neck Muscle Coordination?

Subjective feelings of mental and physical energy and fatigue (ME, MF, PE, PF) have been shown to influence human movement. However, we are unaware of evidence showing an association between changes in individuals' mood states and neuromuscular coordination. PURPOSE: To examine the association between changes in ME, MF, PE, PF and neck muscle coordination. METHODS: A randomized, crossover design was used to induce positive and negative changes in ME, MF, PE and PF. Participants (n = 26, age = 23.04 ± 5.64y) walked around a 10x14m track while wearing noise cancelling headphones under four randomly assigned conditions (silence, music, positive, and negative auditory cues). Moods were measured at baseline and at 5-minute intervals during the 30-minute walk per condition. Mood changes were calculated by subtracting the scores at the previous timepoint from the following timepoint (e.g. T2-T1). Neuromuscular coordination of the left and right cervical erector muscles (CEM) and sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM) was assessed by using sEMG data taken 10s after mood data collection and 10s before subsequent mood data collection. Principal component analyses were used on the first and the last 10s EMG data. Changes in eigenvalue, variance ratio, and contributions of each muscle to the first principal component (CP1) were calculated for each time point. Bayesian multivariate mixed effects regression, with posterior mean estimates (PME) and 95% confidence interval (CI), was used due to non-normality and the four mood states assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant participant effect for all moods but also a time effect for ME, PF, and MF. The contribution of the right SCM to CP1 decreased with increases in ME (PME = -3.53, 95% CI = [-5.97, -1.11]) suggesting that the right SCM contributes less to the neck movement pattern as mental energy increases. The effects of the other muscles on ME, MF, PE and PF are less conclusive due to the inclusion of 0 in the 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this exploratory study suggest that neck muscle coordination may change with subjective feelings of mental energy. A further examination of other muscles and other neuromuscular coordination patterns is needed to identify how changes in these moods influence motor coordination. Supported by: People who were directly funded by grant- Ahmed Torad, Ahmed Kadry, Emily, Ryan, Ali Grant numbers USAID- GSP-T-204 USAID- GSP-P-119 USAID- GSP-P-120

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157608.59873.5d
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Changes In Mental And Physical Energy And Fatigue Impact Changes On Neck Muscle Coordination?

Ali Boolani, Zacharias Papadakis, Kwadwo Osei Appiah-Kubi, Collin D. Bowersock et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Do Changes In Mental And Physical Energy And Fatigue Impact Changes On Neck Muscle Coordination?

Ali Boolani, Zacharias Papadakis, Kwadwo Osei Appiah-Kubi, Collin D. Bowersock, Emily Locke, Ryan McCarthy, Andreas Stamatis, Harshvardhan Harshvardhan, Sergi G. Retortillo, Hugo Quintero, Ahmed Ali Mohammed Torad, Ziyang Zhang, Ahmed Mahmoud Kadry, Gustavo Francisco Saldo
article en

Abstract

Subjective feelings of mental and physical energy and fatigue (ME, MF, PE, PF) have been shown to influence human movement. However, we are unaware of evidence showing an association between changes in individuals' mood states and neuromuscular coordination. PURPOSE: To examine the association between changes in ME, MF, PE, PF and neck muscle coordination. METHODS: A randomized, crossover design was used to induce positive and negative changes in ME, MF, PE and PF. Participants (n = 26, age = 23.04 ± 5.64y) walked around a 10x14m track while wearing noise cancelling headphones under four randomly assigned conditions (silence, music, positive, and negative auditory cues). Moods were measured at baseline and at 5-minute intervals during the 30-minute walk per condition. Mood changes were calculated by subtracting the scores at the previous timepoint from the following timepoint (e.g. T2-T1). Neuromuscular coordination of the left and right cervical erector muscles (CEM) and sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM) was assessed by using sEMG data taken 10s after mood data collection and 10s before subsequent mood data collection. Principal component analyses were used on the first and the last 10s EMG data. Changes in eigenvalue, variance ratio, and contributions of each muscle to the first principal component (CP1) were calculated for each time point. Bayesian multivariate mixed effects regression, with posterior mean estimates (PME) and 95% confidence interval (CI), was used due to non-normality and the four mood states assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant participant effect for all moods but also a time effect for ME, PF, and MF. The contribution of the right SCM to CP1 decreased with increases in ME (PME = -3.53, 95% CI = [-5.97, -1.11]) suggesting that the right SCM contributes less to the neck movement pattern as mental energy increases. The effects of the other muscles on ME, MF, PE and PF are less conclusive due to the inclusion of 0 in the 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this exploratory study suggest that neck muscle coordination may change with subjective feelings of mental energy. A further examination of other muscles and other neuromuscular coordination patterns is needed to identify how changes in these moods influence motor coordination. Supported by: People who were directly funded by grant- Ahmed Torad, Ahmed Kadry, Emily, Ryan, Ali Grant numbers USAID- GSP-T-204 USAID- GSP-P-119 USAID- GSP-P-120

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Oklahoma State University (US), University of Connecticut (US), University of Louisville (US), Barry University (US), Clarkson University (US), Yale University (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.