Sex Differences In Velocity Metrics Across Various Repetitions In Reserve During The Barbell Bench Press

Repetitions in reserve (RIR) and velocity-based training (VBT) are popularly used to auto regulate intensity for exercise programming. Currently, velocity drop offs of 20-40% are commonly found throughout the literature, but it remains unclear how such velocity drop offs relate to RIR. PURPOSE: Due to previously established sex differences in relative barbell velocity, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between sex and relative average concentric velocity (ACV) drop off at 0-3 RIR during a barbell bench press workout. METHODS: Barbell bench press 1RM was assessed in 24 resistance trained (6.0 ± 3.9 yrs) males (n = 12; 24.1 ± 6.1 yrs) and females (n = 12; 22.5 ± 5.5 yrs) followed by a single set to volitional fatigue using 80% of the established 1RM (RTF). A linear transducer assessed ACV for each repetition throughout RTF. Percent velocity drop-off (%DO) was calculated for failure (0RIR), 1 RIR (1RIR), 2 RIR (2RIR), and 3 RIR (3RIR) using the following formula ((X repetition ACV - 1st Repetition ACV)/1st Repetition ACV). A Sex × RIR%DO repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if sex differences were apparent. Significance was accepted at p ≤ .05. RESULTS: A main effect of RIR%DO was noted (p < .001). However, no Sex × RIR%DO interactions (p = .484) or main effects of sex (p = .312) were seen. All proximities to failure were significantly different from one other (3RIR: -14.7 ± 18.2%, 2RIR: -26 ± 16.3%, 1RIR: -38.2 ± 20.8%, 0RIR: -54.1 ± 13.3%; ps < .008). However, this was not found to be impacted by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that velocity decreases significantly the closer to failure a repetition is performed regardless of sex. These results leave us to conclude that at a moderate load, in a laboratory setting, there are no appreciable differences in barbell velocity at 0-3 RIR between sexes. Thus, if VBT is being used in an attempt to objectively auto regulate training, %DO does not need to be adjusted due to sex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161048.87538.15
Primary Topic
Musicians’ Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences In Velocity Metrics Across Various Repetitions In Reserve During The Barbell Bench Press

Matthew T. Stratton, Ray Davis, Ryon Clarke, Genevieve B. Batman et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Musicians’ Health and Performance
article

Sex Differences In Velocity Metrics Across Various Repetitions In Reserve During The Barbell Bench Press

Matthew T. Stratton, Ray Davis, Ryon Clarke, Genevieve B. Batman, Austin T. Massengale, Kaitlyn Evenson-McMurtry, Morgan Wormely
article en

Abstract

Repetitions in reserve (RIR) and velocity-based training (VBT) are popularly used to auto regulate intensity for exercise programming. Currently, velocity drop offs of 20-40% are commonly found throughout the literature, but it remains unclear how such velocity drop offs relate to RIR. PURPOSE: Due to previously established sex differences in relative barbell velocity, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between sex and relative average concentric velocity (ACV) drop off at 0-3 RIR during a barbell bench press workout. METHODS: Barbell bench press 1RM was assessed in 24 resistance trained (6.0 ± 3.9 yrs) males (n = 12; 24.1 ± 6.1 yrs) and females (n = 12; 22.5 ± 5.5 yrs) followed by a single set to volitional fatigue using 80% of the established 1RM (RTF). A linear transducer assessed ACV for each repetition throughout RTF. Percent velocity drop-off (%DO) was calculated for failure (0RIR), 1 RIR (1RIR), 2 RIR (2RIR), and 3 RIR (3RIR) using the following formula ((X repetition ACV - 1st Repetition ACV)/1st Repetition ACV). A Sex × RIR%DO repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if sex differences were apparent. Significance was accepted at p ≤ .05. RESULTS: A main effect of RIR%DO was noted (p < .001). However, no Sex × RIR%DO interactions (p = .484) or main effects of sex (p = .312) were seen. All proximities to failure were significantly different from one other (3RIR: -14.7 ± 18.2%, 2RIR: -26 ± 16.3%, 1RIR: -38.2 ± 20.8%, 0RIR: -54.1 ± 13.3%; ps < .008). However, this was not found to be impacted by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that velocity decreases significantly the closer to failure a repetition is performed regardless of sex. These results leave us to conclude that at a moderate load, in a laboratory setting, there are no appreciable differences in barbell velocity at 0-3 RIR between sexes. Thus, if VBT is being used in an attempt to objectively auto regulate training, %DO does not need to be adjusted due to sex.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of South Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Musicians’ Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.