Recovery Of Preinjury Walking Biomechanics Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction In Division I Collegiate Athletes

Altered involved (INV) knee joint walking mechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are well documented. Typically, the uninvolved limb (UNI) is used as a healthy comparison. However, bilateral impairments can occur post-ACLR, which could contribute to misrepresentation of the recovery of gait mechanics. Preinjury (PRE) walking mechanics, though rarely available, offer an ideal reference to characterize post-ACLR changes in both limbs. PURPOSE: Assess INV, UNI, and between limb changes in walking mechanics from PRE to 17-months post-ACLR. METHODS: Division I collegiate athletes (n = 23; 12 Female; age: 20.5 ± 1.5) walked on a treadmill (1.2 m/s) while kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRF) were collected at PRE, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 17 months (M) post-ACLR, with 23, 12, 17, 12, 12, and 5 observations, respectively. Peak vertical GRF (vGRF), knee flexion excursion (KFE) and peak knee extensor moments (PKEM) during stance were variables of interest. Linear mixed effects models assessed changes in mechanics from PRE within and between each limb with time, limb, and a time*limb interaction as fixed effects and athlete and limb as random effects. Least square mean differences ± standard error and associated Tukey-adjusted p-values are reported. RESULTS: Time*limb interactions were significant for vGRF (p = 0.02), KFE (p < 0.001), and PKEM (p = 0.01). INV KFE decreased at 4 M (5.9° ± 1.1, p < 0.01) and 6 M (5.3° ± 0.9, p < 0.01), recovered to PRE by 8 M (3.5° ± 1.1, p = 0.06), and remained similar to PRE at 12 M and 17 M. Compared to PRE, no significant INV deficits (all p-values>0.05) were observed for vGRF (range: -0.25 ± 0.10, -2.4% [4 M] to 0.02 ± 0.10 N/kg, 0.2% [8 M]) or PKEM (range: -0.08 ± 0.04, -23% [4 M] to 0.02 ± 0.04 Nm/kg, 5.8% [8 M]). No significant UNI changes from PRE were observed for all metrics (all p-values>0.05). INV KFE was less than UNI at 4 M (5.7° ± 1.3, p < 0.01) and 6 M (5.4° ± 1.1, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: INV KFE during walking is reduced at 4 M and 6 M post-ACLR compared to PRE and UNI. UNI appears to be a valid reference for recovery of INV walking mechanics given minimal changes from PRE. Although INV vGRF and PKEM showed similar trends over time, changes from PRE were not statistically significant. Assessing gait mechanics on an individual basis is likely needed, given the significant variation in INV mechanics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157440.64062.f0
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovery Of Preinjury Walking Biomechanics Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction In Division I Collegiate Athletes

Keith A. Knurr, Elizabeth Schmida, Daniel G. Cobian, Allison K. Faber
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Recovery Of Preinjury Walking Biomechanics Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction In Division I Collegiate Athletes

Keith A. Knurr, Elizabeth Schmida, Daniel G. Cobian, Allison K. Faber
article en

Abstract

Altered involved (INV) knee joint walking mechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are well documented. Typically, the uninvolved limb (UNI) is used as a healthy comparison. However, bilateral impairments can occur post-ACLR, which could contribute to misrepresentation of the recovery of gait mechanics. Preinjury (PRE) walking mechanics, though rarely available, offer an ideal reference to characterize post-ACLR changes in both limbs. PURPOSE: Assess INV, UNI, and between limb changes in walking mechanics from PRE to 17-months post-ACLR. METHODS: Division I collegiate athletes (n = 23; 12 Female; age: 20.5 ± 1.5) walked on a treadmill (1.2 m/s) while kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRF) were collected at PRE, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 17 months (M) post-ACLR, with 23, 12, 17, 12, 12, and 5 observations, respectively. Peak vertical GRF (vGRF), knee flexion excursion (KFE) and peak knee extensor moments (PKEM) during stance were variables of interest. Linear mixed effects models assessed changes in mechanics from PRE within and between each limb with time, limb, and a time*limb interaction as fixed effects and athlete and limb as random effects. Least square mean differences ± standard error and associated Tukey-adjusted p-values are reported. RESULTS: Time*limb interactions were significant for vGRF (p = 0.02), KFE (p < 0.001), and PKEM (p = 0.01). INV KFE decreased at 4 M (5.9° ± 1.1, p < 0.01) and 6 M (5.3° ± 0.9, p < 0.01), recovered to PRE by 8 M (3.5° ± 1.1, p = 0.06), and remained similar to PRE at 12 M and 17 M. Compared to PRE, no significant INV deficits (all p-values>0.05) were observed for vGRF (range: -0.25 ± 0.10, -2.4% [4 M] to 0.02 ± 0.10 N/kg, 0.2% [8 M]) or PKEM (range: -0.08 ± 0.04, -23% [4 M] to 0.02 ± 0.04 Nm/kg, 5.8% [8 M]). No significant UNI changes from PRE were observed for all metrics (all p-values>0.05). INV KFE was less than UNI at 4 M (5.7° ± 1.3, p < 0.01) and 6 M (5.4° ± 1.1, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: INV KFE during walking is reduced at 4 M and 6 M post-ACLR compared to PRE and UNI. UNI appears to be a valid reference for recovery of INV walking mechanics given minimal changes from PRE. Although INV vGRF and PKEM showed similar trends over time, changes from PRE were not statistically significant. Assessing gait mechanics on an individual basis is likely needed, given the significant variation in INV mechanics.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.