Responsiveness Of Hip And Wrist Accelerometer-based Physical Activity Estimates In Youth

Measurement of change in physical activity (PA) between time points is important for informing PA interventions and outcomes. The ability to detect change over time, or responsiveness, has received minimal attention in wearable activity monitors, especially compared with a criterion measure. PURPOSE: To determine the responsiveness of accelerometer-based methods located at the hip and wrist to predict PA intensity in youth, compared to a criterion measure. METHODS: Forty-eight participants (11.8 + 3.3 yrs, 23 males) performed two 2-hr free-living visits. Participants wore a portable indirect calorimeter (Cosmed K4b2 or K5) and ActiGraph GT9X devices (right and left wrists, right hip). For each visit, time spent in sedentary behavior (SB, <1.5 METs), light PA (LPA, 1.5-2.99 METs), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA, >3.0 METs) was calculated using indirect calorimetry and estimated using three hip-based regression methods and seven wrist-based cut-point methods. Change in time spent in each intensity level between visits was used as the measure of responsiveness. One-way repeated-measures ANOVAs and mean absolute error were used to compare responsiveness reported by each method to indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between indirect calorimetry and the hip and wrist methods for mean responsiveness in SB (F = 0.17, p = 0.99), LPA (F = 1.00, p = 0.43), and MVPA (F = 1.16, p = 0.31). Although there were no group-level differences, individual errors ranged from 0.0-67.5% across the different intensity categories. CONCLUSIONS: The responsiveness of the accelerometer-based PA estimation algorithms in this analysis was similar to the change demonstrated by indirect calorimetry at a group level but demonstrated meaningful individual variability, indicating a potential washout effect. At a group level, the estimates appropriately responded to changes in youth PA levels, but further investigation is needed to assess individual-level applicability. Supported by: This research was supported by the NIH grant R01HD083431.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001160736.80026.24
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsiveness Of Hip And Wrist Accelerometer-based Physical Activity Estimates In Youth

Scott E. Crouter, Nicholas Remillard, Paul R. Hibbing, Samuel R. LaMunion
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Responsiveness Of Hip And Wrist Accelerometer-based Physical Activity Estimates In Youth

Scott E. Crouter, Nicholas Remillard, Paul R. Hibbing, Samuel R. LaMunion
article en

Abstract

Measurement of change in physical activity (PA) between time points is important for informing PA interventions and outcomes. The ability to detect change over time, or responsiveness, has received minimal attention in wearable activity monitors, especially compared with a criterion measure. PURPOSE: To determine the responsiveness of accelerometer-based methods located at the hip and wrist to predict PA intensity in youth, compared to a criterion measure. METHODS: Forty-eight participants (11.8 + 3.3 yrs, 23 males) performed two 2-hr free-living visits. Participants wore a portable indirect calorimeter (Cosmed K4b2 or K5) and ActiGraph GT9X devices (right and left wrists, right hip). For each visit, time spent in sedentary behavior (SB, <1.5 METs), light PA (LPA, 1.5-2.99 METs), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA, >3.0 METs) was calculated using indirect calorimetry and estimated using three hip-based regression methods and seven wrist-based cut-point methods. Change in time spent in each intensity level between visits was used as the measure of responsiveness. One-way repeated-measures ANOVAs and mean absolute error were used to compare responsiveness reported by each method to indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between indirect calorimetry and the hip and wrist methods for mean responsiveness in SB (F = 0.17, p = 0.99), LPA (F = 1.00, p = 0.43), and MVPA (F = 1.16, p = 0.31). Although there were no group-level differences, individual errors ranged from 0.0-67.5% across the different intensity categories. CONCLUSIONS: The responsiveness of the accelerometer-based PA estimation algorithms in this analysis was similar to the change demonstrated by indirect calorimetry at a group level but demonstrated meaningful individual variability, indicating a potential washout effect. At a group level, the estimates appropriately responded to changes in youth PA levels, but further investigation is needed to assess individual-level applicability. Supported by: This research was supported by the NIH grant R01HD083431.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
National Institutes of Health (US), Knoxville College (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.