Handgrip Strength, Appendicular Lean Mass, And Muscle Quality Are Lower In Adults With Down Syndrome

Individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) experience accelerated musculoskeletal aging, including reduced strength, poor body composition, and a higher prevalence of sarcopenia, all of which contribute to functional limitations and increased health risks. Muscle quality index (MQI) offers a simple assessment of muscle efficiency that may be valuable for adults with DS; however, no literature exists comparing MQI differences between individuals with DS against individuals without down syndrome (non-DS). PURPOSE: This study compared MQI, hand grip strength (HGS) and total appendicular lean mass (ALM) between individuals with DS and non-DS. METHODS: Individuals with DS (n = 13) were weight-matched against a group of non-DS. All dependent variables were compared between groups using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Cohen’s d effect sizes, with all outcomes reported as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: For this sample, 13 DS (5 males; aged: 26.2 ± 8.9 years; height: 149.0 ± 9.7 cm; weight: 72.5 ± 15.8 kg; body mass index: 32.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2) and 13 non-DS (6 males; aged: 21.3 ± 4.6 years; height: 171.2 ± 9.6 cm; weight: 72.5 ± 14.9 kg; body mass index: 24.7 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were included in all analyses. After matching for weight, the DS group showed lower mean values for arm (4.02 ± 1.45 kg vs 6.14 ± 2.58 kg, d = 1.01) and appendicular lean mass (15.78 ± 3.98 kg vs 24.12 ± 7.37 kg, d = 1.42) against the non-DS group. Regarding handgrip, non-DS showed large practical differences for HGSRight, HGSLeft, and HGSTotal when compared to DS (d = 1.62 (right), d = 1.50 (left); d = 1.58, all p < 0.001). Additionally, the non-DS group exhibited large differences in MQIARMS (11.92 ± 1.92, d = 1.41) versus individuals with DS (8.91 ± 2.32). Lastly, MQIALM was greater in non-DS (2.92 ± 0.46, d = 1.04) than the DS group (2.25 ± 0.79). CONCLUSION: Current study findings demonstrate that individuals with DS possess lower HGS, ALM, and MQI compared to non-DS. These findings highlight the need for tailored interventions to enhance muscle health in adults with DS, addressing unique muscle deficits when compared to weight-matched peers without DS. Supported by: Research reported in this abstract was supported by the National Institute of Child and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21HD115191

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155360.53690.52
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handgrip Strength, Appendicular Lean Mass, And Muscle Quality Are Lower In Adults With Down Syndrome

Michael R. Esco, George R. Schaefer, Ronald L. Snarr, Brett S. Nickerson et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Handgrip Strength, Appendicular Lean Mass, And Muscle Quality Are Lower In Adults With Down Syndrome

Michael R. Esco, George R. Schaefer, Ronald L. Snarr, Brett S. Nickerson, Elroy J. Aguiar, Stefan A. Czerwinski, Ayush Mehra
article en

Abstract

Individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) experience accelerated musculoskeletal aging, including reduced strength, poor body composition, and a higher prevalence of sarcopenia, all of which contribute to functional limitations and increased health risks. Muscle quality index (MQI) offers a simple assessment of muscle efficiency that may be valuable for adults with DS; however, no literature exists comparing MQI differences between individuals with DS against individuals without down syndrome (non-DS). PURPOSE: This study compared MQI, hand grip strength (HGS) and total appendicular lean mass (ALM) between individuals with DS and non-DS. METHODS: Individuals with DS (n = 13) were weight-matched against a group of non-DS. All dependent variables were compared between groups using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Cohen’s d effect sizes, with all outcomes reported as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: For this sample, 13 DS (5 males; aged: 26.2 ± 8.9 years; height: 149.0 ± 9.7 cm; weight: 72.5 ± 15.8 kg; body mass index: 32.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2) and 13 non-DS (6 males; aged: 21.3 ± 4.6 years; height: 171.2 ± 9.6 cm; weight: 72.5 ± 14.9 kg; body mass index: 24.7 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were included in all analyses. After matching for weight, the DS group showed lower mean values for arm (4.02 ± 1.45 kg vs 6.14 ± 2.58 kg, d = 1.01) and appendicular lean mass (15.78 ± 3.98 kg vs 24.12 ± 7.37 kg, d = 1.42) against the non-DS group. Regarding handgrip, non-DS showed large practical differences for HGSRight, HGSLeft, and HGSTotal when compared to DS (d = 1.62 (right), d = 1.50 (left); d = 1.58, all p < 0.001). Additionally, the non-DS group exhibited large differences in MQIARMS (11.92 ± 1.92, d = 1.41) versus individuals with DS (8.91 ± 2.32). Lastly, MQIALM was greater in non-DS (2.92 ± 0.46, d = 1.04) than the DS group (2.25 ± 0.79). CONCLUSION: Current study findings demonstrate that individuals with DS possess lower HGS, ALM, and MQI compared to non-DS. These findings highlight the need for tailored interventions to enhance muscle health in adults with DS, addressing unique muscle deficits when compared to weight-matched peers without DS. Supported by: Research reported in this abstract was supported by the National Institute of Child and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21HD115191

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Alabama (US), The Ohio State University (US), Auburn University at Montgomery (US), Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.