Analyzing Vertical Ground Reaction Forces And Coordination Of Medial Lateral Ground Reaction Forces In Jumping

Jumping is a dynamic movement dominant in many sports and used in athletic assessment; however, there is minimal knowledge comparing vertical ground reaction forces (VGRF) and coordination with medial lateral ground reaction forces (MLGRF) in jump height (JH). PURPOSE: To measure the level of in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) coordination between VGRF and MLGRF using continuous relative phase (CRP) and estimated jump height performance. METHODS: Thirty-six professional soccer players (20.78 ± 1.67 yrs, 176.82 ± 8.97 cm, 73.98 ± 10.10 kg) were included in this study. Manual muscle tests were conducted prior to jumping protocol. Three bilateral counter-movement jumps (CMJ), two right single-leg counter-movement jumps (RSL), and two left counter-movement jumps (LSL) were performed on bilateral force plates. Participants were instructed to pause prior to each jump. Univariate linear regression model examined relationship between Total VGRF vs Total MLGRF RMS CRP and Jump Height. Figure 1 shows the comparison between Total VGRF and Total MLGRF for a single countermovement jump with the calculated CRP. RESULTS: Total VGRF vs Total MLGRF RMS CRP was not predictive of jump height (R2 = -2.227), suggesting a non-linear relationship between the two variables. CONCLUSION: This pilot study examined jump height in professional athletes. Preliminary results do not suggest a significant correlation between Total VGRF vs Total MLGRF RMS CRP and estimated jump height. Future research examining multiple predictors of jump height or looking at each leg individually (right vs. left) is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001156288.53456.bf
Primary Topic
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Vertical Ground Reaction Forces And Coordination Of Medial Lateral Ground Reaction Forces In Jumping

Jaynesh Patel, Michael Ward, Jeromy D. Miramontes
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
article

Analyzing Vertical Ground Reaction Forces And Coordination Of Medial Lateral Ground Reaction Forces In Jumping

Jaynesh Patel, Michael Ward, Jeromy D. Miramontes
article en

Abstract

Jumping is a dynamic movement dominant in many sports and used in athletic assessment; however, there is minimal knowledge comparing vertical ground reaction forces (VGRF) and coordination with medial lateral ground reaction forces (MLGRF) in jump height (JH). PURPOSE: To measure the level of in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) coordination between VGRF and MLGRF using continuous relative phase (CRP) and estimated jump height performance. METHODS: Thirty-six professional soccer players (20.78 ± 1.67 yrs, 176.82 ± 8.97 cm, 73.98 ± 10.10 kg) were included in this study. Manual muscle tests were conducted prior to jumping protocol. Three bilateral counter-movement jumps (CMJ), two right single-leg counter-movement jumps (RSL), and two left counter-movement jumps (LSL) were performed on bilateral force plates. Participants were instructed to pause prior to each jump. Univariate linear regression model examined relationship between Total VGRF vs Total MLGRF RMS CRP and Jump Height. Figure 1 shows the comparison between Total VGRF and Total MLGRF for a single countermovement jump with the calculated CRP. RESULTS: Total VGRF vs Total MLGRF RMS CRP was not predictive of jump height (R2 = -2.227), suggesting a non-linear relationship between the two variables. CONCLUSION: This pilot study examined jump height in professional athletes. Preliminary results do not suggest a significant correlation between Total VGRF vs Total MLGRF RMS CRP and estimated jump height. Future research examining multiple predictors of jump height or looking at each leg individually (right vs. left) is warranted.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Prisma Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.