Hormone Phase Considerations On Corticospinal Pathway Measures In Males And Females

Previous evidence suggests that hormones may impact excitatory and inhibitory neurophysiological outcomes differently in males and females. However, sex- and hormone-related differences in excitability and inhibition of the corticomotor pathway have not been widely studied. PURPOSE: To examine sex-related differences and hormone phase influences on corticospinal excitability and inhibition. METHODS: Thirty participants, 15 males (23.3 ± 1.3 yrs), 15 females (22.9 ± 2.8 yrs), visited the laboratory for 2 visits, one in each of their high and low hormones phases. Males were tested in the morning and in the afternoon, while females were tested in the mid-follicular and in the mid-luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Electromyography was recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Single-pulse and paired-pulse stimuli were used to assess excitability via the motor-evoked potential (MEP) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) and inhibition via the cortical silent period (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). All outcome measures were compared between phases within each sex and between males and females with averaged phase data. RESULTS: No significant differences in excitability were found between sexes (MEP: p = 0.09, d = 0.65; ICF: p = 0.65, d = 0.17), nor between phases for males (MEP: p = 0.67, d = 0.12; ICF: p = 0.24, d = 0.32) or females (MEP: p = 0.25, d = 0.31; ICF: p = 0.95, d = 0.02). Males displayed greater inhibition compared to females in SICI (p = 0.004, d = -1.15) and LICI (p = 0.008, d = -1.12) but not CSP (p = 0.28, d = 0.40). Within males, inhibition did not differ across phases (CSP: p = 0.13, d = 0.41; SICI: p = 0.33, d = 0.26; LICI: p = 0.70, d = 0.11). In females CSP (p = 0.04, d = 0.60) indicated greater inhibition in the low hormone phase, however there was no significant difference between phases for the other measures of inhibition (SICI: p = 0.80, d = 0.07; LICI: p = 0.63, d = 0.13). CONCLUSION: These results suggest hormone phase may be an important consideration for CSP, but not for other measures of corticospinal inhibition or for measures of excitability. Supported by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) RGPIN-2019-05127

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001156088.14062.5a
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hormone Phase Considerations On Corticospinal Pathway Measures In Males And Females

Alexandra N. Pauhl, Anita Christie, Alicia M. Kells
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
article

Hormone Phase Considerations On Corticospinal Pathway Measures In Males And Females

Alexandra N. Pauhl, Anita Christie, Alicia M. Kells
article en

Abstract

Previous evidence suggests that hormones may impact excitatory and inhibitory neurophysiological outcomes differently in males and females. However, sex- and hormone-related differences in excitability and inhibition of the corticomotor pathway have not been widely studied. PURPOSE: To examine sex-related differences and hormone phase influences on corticospinal excitability and inhibition. METHODS: Thirty participants, 15 males (23.3 ± 1.3 yrs), 15 females (22.9 ± 2.8 yrs), visited the laboratory for 2 visits, one in each of their high and low hormones phases. Males were tested in the morning and in the afternoon, while females were tested in the mid-follicular and in the mid-luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Electromyography was recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Single-pulse and paired-pulse stimuli were used to assess excitability via the motor-evoked potential (MEP) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) and inhibition via the cortical silent period (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). All outcome measures were compared between phases within each sex and between males and females with averaged phase data. RESULTS: No significant differences in excitability were found between sexes (MEP: p = 0.09, d = 0.65; ICF: p = 0.65, d = 0.17), nor between phases for males (MEP: p = 0.67, d = 0.12; ICF: p = 0.24, d = 0.32) or females (MEP: p = 0.25, d = 0.31; ICF: p = 0.95, d = 0.02). Males displayed greater inhibition compared to females in SICI (p = 0.004, d = -1.15) and LICI (p = 0.008, d = -1.12) but not CSP (p = 0.28, d = 0.40). Within males, inhibition did not differ across phases (CSP: p = 0.13, d = 0.41; SICI: p = 0.33, d = 0.26; LICI: p = 0.70, d = 0.11). In females CSP (p = 0.04, d = 0.60) indicated greater inhibition in the low hormone phase, however there was no significant difference between phases for the other measures of inhibition (SICI: p = 0.80, d = 0.07; LICI: p = 0.63, d = 0.13). CONCLUSION: These results suggest hormone phase may be an important consideration for CSP, but not for other measures of corticospinal inhibition or for measures of excitability. Supported by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) RGPIN-2019-05127

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Western University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.