Evaluating Differences In Objective Sleep Outcomes By Physical Activity Status In College-aged Individuals

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep is associated with cardiometabolic diseases, obesity, and all-cause mortality. Many college-aged individuals have suboptimal sleep durations and poor sleep quality characterized by extended latency (how long it takes to fall asleep) and low efficiency (percentage of time spent asleep while in bed). Lifestyle factors such as physical activity (PA) may influence sleep, but there is limited evidence evaluating the association between PA status and objective sleep assessments in college-aged individuals. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare objective sleep outcomes (duration, latency, efficiency) between active and inactive college-aged (18-25 yrs old) individuals. METHODS: 22 college-aged active (n = 12) and inactive (n = 10) individuals (68% female, Age: 22.5 ± 2.0 yrs, Body Mass Index: 24.2 ± 3.0 kg/m2) participated in this study. Participants self-reporting less than 2 days a week of exercise were classified as inactive; PA was quantified by calculating moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week reported by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Average sleep duration, latency and efficiency were measured by a 3rd generation Oura Ring for 1 week and used for analyses. Three analysis of covariance tests compared differences in each sleep outcome between the active and inactive groups while controlling for sex. RESULTS: The average MVPA was 312.1 ± 105.5 min/wk for the active group and 33.5 ± 48.9 min/wk for the inactive group. There were no significant differences between groups in sleep duration (active: 8.1 ± 0.5 hrs, inactive: 8.1 ± 0.8 hrs, p = 0.895), latency (active: 14.8 ± 3.9 mins, inactive: 16.5 ± 6.7 mins, p = 0.762), or efficiency (active: 89.3 ± 3.4, inactive: 88.9 ± 3.3, p = 0.444). CONCLUSIONS: In this college-aged sample, sleep duration, latency, or efficiency did not differ by PA status. Future research should investigate the effects of other factors on sleep such as timing of PA participation, sex, stress, and additional lifestyle behaviors (e.g., caffeine, alcohol, cannabis use) in a larger sample. This could provide potential targets for interventions focused on improving sleep and health in college-aged individuals. Supported by: The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UM1TR004406. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155240.93218.9f
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Differences In Objective Sleep Outcomes By Physical Activity Status In College-aged Individuals

Caitlin Brinkman, Malia N.M. Blue, Jimikaye B. Courtney, Shelby Baez et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sleep and related disorders
article

Evaluating Differences In Objective Sleep Outcomes By Physical Activity Status In College-aged Individuals

Caitlin Brinkman, Malia N.M. Blue, Jimikaye B. Courtney, Shelby Baez, Juliette Levet-Bourtayre
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep is associated with cardiometabolic diseases, obesity, and all-cause mortality. Many college-aged individuals have suboptimal sleep durations and poor sleep quality characterized by extended latency (how long it takes to fall asleep) and low efficiency (percentage of time spent asleep while in bed). Lifestyle factors such as physical activity (PA) may influence sleep, but there is limited evidence evaluating the association between PA status and objective sleep assessments in college-aged individuals. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare objective sleep outcomes (duration, latency, efficiency) between active and inactive college-aged (18-25 yrs old) individuals. METHODS: 22 college-aged active (n = 12) and inactive (n = 10) individuals (68% female, Age: 22.5 ± 2.0 yrs, Body Mass Index: 24.2 ± 3.0 kg/m2) participated in this study. Participants self-reporting less than 2 days a week of exercise were classified as inactive; PA was quantified by calculating moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week reported by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Average sleep duration, latency and efficiency were measured by a 3rd generation Oura Ring for 1 week and used for analyses. Three analysis of covariance tests compared differences in each sleep outcome between the active and inactive groups while controlling for sex. RESULTS: The average MVPA was 312.1 ± 105.5 min/wk for the active group and 33.5 ± 48.9 min/wk for the inactive group. There were no significant differences between groups in sleep duration (active: 8.1 ± 0.5 hrs, inactive: 8.1 ± 0.8 hrs, p = 0.895), latency (active: 14.8 ± 3.9 mins, inactive: 16.5 ± 6.7 mins, p = 0.762), or efficiency (active: 89.3 ± 3.4, inactive: 88.9 ± 3.3, p = 0.444). CONCLUSIONS: In this college-aged sample, sleep duration, latency, or efficiency did not differ by PA status. Future research should investigate the effects of other factors on sleep such as timing of PA participation, sex, stress, and additional lifestyle behaviors (e.g., caffeine, alcohol, cannabis use) in a larger sample. This could provide potential targets for interventions focused on improving sleep and health in college-aged individuals. Supported by: The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UM1TR004406. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.