COMPARISON OF PLAYERLOAD™ AND PLAYERLOAD™ PER MINUTE DURING PRACTICES AND GAMES IN A COLLEGIATE DIVISION I WOMEN’S BASKETBALL TEAM BETWEEN PRESEASON AND REGULAR SEASON ACROSS THREE YEARS

Monitoring external load in collegiate Division I (D1) women’s basketball athletes is crucial for performance optimization and injury risk mitigation, but the current lack of specific and comparable literature has prevented the establishment of normative values in this population. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to profile and compare the external player load (PL) and player load per minute (PL·min-1) across three competitive seasons (2021-2024), comparing four distinct phases: 8-hour preseason(P08), 20-hour preseason(P20), non-conference (NON), and conference (CON) play. We also compared practice sessions versus games. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of three teams (n = 13) over three years, with seven (n = 7) athletes per team each season, was conducted using inertial movement wearable devices during every practice and game for 3 consecutive seasons. Statistical analyses was conducted using a 3 by 4 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and post hoc testing. Main effects of group and phase and significant year by phase interactions were examined for games+practices, games only, and practices only. Significance was set to (p < 0.05). RESULT: Findings indicated that the P20 has significantly high PL, followed by P08, and then NON and CON which were statistically similar. Similarly, PL·min-1 was most pronounced in P08, and significantly greater in both preseason phases compared to regular season play (p < 0.005). Practices exhibited significantly greater average PL than games, particularly during the P20 phase (p = 0.006). Year 1 showed higher PL overall, while PL·min-1 was lower in CON compared to subsequent seasons (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The trends suggest improved load management, with PL and PL·min-1 in recent seasons reflecting a more ideal workload distribution These findings underscore the importance of external load monitoring for informed periodization and performance optimization

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161864.18460.68
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF PLAYERLOAD™ AND PLAYERLOAD™ PER MINUTE DURING PRACTICES AND GAMES IN A COLLEGIATE DIVISION I WOMEN’S BASKETBALL TEAM BETWEEN PRESEASON AND REGULAR SEASON ACROSS THREE YEARS

Andrea Hudy, Robert A. Huggins, Douglas J. Casa, Jui Shah et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

COMPARISON OF PLAYERLOAD™ AND PLAYERLOAD™ PER MINUTE DURING PRACTICES AND GAMES IN A COLLEGIATE DIVISION I WOMEN’S BASKETBALL TEAM BETWEEN PRESEASON AND REGULAR SEASON ACROSS THREE YEARS

Andrea Hudy, Robert A. Huggins, Douglas J. Casa, Jui Shah, Carla Guirguis, Allison Wakefield
article en

Abstract

Monitoring external load in collegiate Division I (D1) women’s basketball athletes is crucial for performance optimization and injury risk mitigation, but the current lack of specific and comparable literature has prevented the establishment of normative values in this population. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to profile and compare the external player load (PL) and player load per minute (PL·min-1) across three competitive seasons (2021-2024), comparing four distinct phases: 8-hour preseason(P08), 20-hour preseason(P20), non-conference (NON), and conference (CON) play. We also compared practice sessions versus games. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of three teams (n = 13) over three years, with seven (n = 7) athletes per team each season, was conducted using inertial movement wearable devices during every practice and game for 3 consecutive seasons. Statistical analyses was conducted using a 3 by 4 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and post hoc testing. Main effects of group and phase and significant year by phase interactions were examined for games+practices, games only, and practices only. Significance was set to (p < 0.05). RESULT: Findings indicated that the P20 has significantly high PL, followed by P08, and then NON and CON which were statistically similar. Similarly, PL·min-1 was most pronounced in P08, and significantly greater in both preseason phases compared to regular season play (p < 0.005). Practices exhibited significantly greater average PL than games, particularly during the P20 phase (p = 0.006). Year 1 showed higher PL overall, while PL·min-1 was lower in CON compared to subsequent seasons (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The trends suggest improved load management, with PL and PL·min-1 in recent seasons reflecting a more ideal workload distribution These findings underscore the importance of external load monitoring for informed periodization and performance optimization

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Connecticut (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.