Differences In Nutritional Beliefs Among Sub-Elite Male And Female Rugby Athletes

PURPOSE: This study assessed changes in nutritional beliefs between sub-elite rugby 7 s athletes using a survey to identify attitudes toward nutritional beliefs and their intersection with performance. BACKGROUND: For peak performance, athletes need optimal nutrition. Despite its importance, professional athletes show poor positive attitudes toward nutrition, suggesting the neglect of healthy dietary practices. Males and females also have differing perspectives and priorities regarding diet with men highlighting the negative effect of unhealthy nutrition on performance. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study survey administered to sub-elite rugby 7 s players aged 14 to 40 at 2010-11 Las Vegas Invitational/Northeast RFU Summer 7 s and readministered, at 2021 Empire Geographic Union 7 s Qualifiers. The questionnaire, aligned with current nutritional guidelines and validated surveys, and analyzed with a Pearson Chi-square analysis used to compare the cohorts' results. RESULTS: In analyzing the nutritional beliefs of males (n = 171) compared to females (n = 73), a Pearson Chi-squared test found significant differences in the responses to “Do you believe that you should avoid high-fat foods for optimal performance?” (χ2 = 14.61, df = 1, p = 0.0001), “What is more important, the diet surrounding training or the diet surrounding a game/match?” (χ2 = 21.85, df = 4, p = 0.0002), “Do you believe that snacks are a good way to supply more energy?” (χ2 = 12.34, df = 1, p = 0.0004), “What an athlete eats is only important if the athlete is trying to gain or lose weight” (χ2 = 3.72, df = 1, p = 0.054). For high-fat foods, 95.65% of females vs. 76.16% of males responded “yes.” For snacks, 30.16% of females vs. 58.71% of males responded “yes,” and for weight management, 10.00% of females vs. 20.53% of males responded “yes.” CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate significant differences in the nutritional beliefs of male and female rugby athletes particularly beliefs centered around the intersection of nutrition and performance, highlighting sex-specific attitudes and practices regarding diet, energy supplementation, and weight management in their performance. This suggests that sex-specific nutritional plans may help maintain strong nutritional habits and peak performance in American rugby athletes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155264.57802.ca
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences In Nutritional Beliefs Among Sub-Elite Male And Female Rugby Athletes

Richard Ma, Victor Lopez, Aakansha Kanyal, Mya C. Gruett et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

Differences In Nutritional Beliefs Among Sub-Elite Male And Female Rugby Athletes

Richard Ma, Victor Lopez, Aakansha Kanyal, Mya C. Gruett, Vladimir Versinin, Benjamin Kastrati, Liana Y. Weissman, Nichole R. Manalil
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed changes in nutritional beliefs between sub-elite rugby 7 s athletes using a survey to identify attitudes toward nutritional beliefs and their intersection with performance. BACKGROUND: For peak performance, athletes need optimal nutrition. Despite its importance, professional athletes show poor positive attitudes toward nutrition, suggesting the neglect of healthy dietary practices. Males and females also have differing perspectives and priorities regarding diet with men highlighting the negative effect of unhealthy nutrition on performance. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study survey administered to sub-elite rugby 7 s players aged 14 to 40 at 2010-11 Las Vegas Invitational/Northeast RFU Summer 7 s and readministered, at 2021 Empire Geographic Union 7 s Qualifiers. The questionnaire, aligned with current nutritional guidelines and validated surveys, and analyzed with a Pearson Chi-square analysis used to compare the cohorts' results. RESULTS: In analyzing the nutritional beliefs of males (n = 171) compared to females (n = 73), a Pearson Chi-squared test found significant differences in the responses to “Do you believe that you should avoid high-fat foods for optimal performance?” (χ2 = 14.61, df = 1, p = 0.0001), “What is more important, the diet surrounding training or the diet surrounding a game/match?” (χ2 = 21.85, df = 4, p = 0.0002), “Do you believe that snacks are a good way to supply more energy?” (χ2 = 12.34, df = 1, p = 0.0004), “What an athlete eats is only important if the athlete is trying to gain or lose weight” (χ2 = 3.72, df = 1, p = 0.054). For high-fat foods, 95.65% of females vs. 76.16% of males responded “yes.” For snacks, 30.16% of females vs. 58.71% of males responded “yes,” and for weight management, 10.00% of females vs. 20.53% of males responded “yes.” CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate significant differences in the nutritional beliefs of male and female rugby athletes particularly beliefs centered around the intersection of nutrition and performance, highlighting sex-specific attitudes and practices regarding diet, energy supplementation, and weight management in their performance. This suggests that sex-specific nutritional plans may help maintain strong nutritional habits and peak performance in American rugby athletes.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.