Unbiased Selection Of Countermovement Jump Metrics For Fatigue In Prolonged Heavy Load Rucking

The countermovement jump (CMJ) is a non-invasive, easily administered method to assess neuromuscular fatigue. However, prior studies have analyzed multiple correlated CMJ metrics without a clear rationale. To optimize the utility of the CMJ for fatigue detection and streamline its application, identifying a subset of uncorrelated metrics tailored to the fatigue context is essential. PURPOSE: This study aimed to statistically filter discrete CMJ metrics to optimize the detection of physical fatigue status. METHODS: Sixty-seven healthy, fit adults (Age: 21.9 ± 3.0 y, VO2PEAK: 47.2 ± 6.2 ml·kg-1·min-1, ♂/♀ = 39/28) completed four 30-min treadmill rucking blocks carrying 47% of their lean mass. Each block consisted of two 15-min phases: 1) at a speed equal to 47% VO2PEAK, and 2) to cover the maximum distance possible while self-adjusting speed. Three maximal effort CMJs without arm swing were performed on a calibrated AMTI force plate and averaged at baseline (PRE); between blocks (IB1-3); and at 0, 30, and 60 min of recovery (POST, POST30, POST60). Feature selection via differential analysis (p-value <10E-24, fold change > |1|) alongside correlation-based hierarchical clustering reduced 28 discrete CMJ parameters to a subset of key performance indicators. Linear mixed-effects models with a random subject term determined the influence of time and sex on the selected metrics (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Momentum (MOM), peak concentric velocity (PCV), mean concentric velocity (MCV), mean braking power (MBP), and mean braking force (MBF) were identified as most responsive to the fatigue protocol. Raw metric values and percent changes declined progressively from IB1, with large to extreme effect sizes (0.8 - >2.0) observed at POST, POST30, and POST60. MBP showed the largest percent change across recovery time points (%∆ at POST, POST30, and POST60: -11.53, -11.56, -14.96). MOM, PCV, and MCV were significantly higher in males compared to females based on absolute but not relative change. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for an approach to selecting specific CMJ metrics to assess physical fatigue progression. These findings can help practitioners optimize the detection of fatigue by focusing CMJ testing on the most useful indicators, enhancing training and recovery strategies in athletic and military contexts. Supported by: This work was made possible in part by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under Grant Number HR0011-22-2-0040. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of DARPA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161656.85105.93
Primary Topic
Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unbiased Selection Of Countermovement Jump Metrics For Fatigue In Prolonged Heavy Load Rucking

Steven E. Riechman, Roozbeh Jafari, Erin E. Simmons, Sean T. Stanelle et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
article

Unbiased Selection Of Countermovement Jump Metrics For Fatigue In Prolonged Heavy Load Rucking

Steven E. Riechman, Roozbeh Jafari, Erin E. Simmons, Sean T. Stanelle, Ranjana K. Mehta, Ivan Ivanov, F. Nelson Ford, Jason D. Christie, Aaron J. Riviere, Austin J. Burmeier, John D. Tebbetts
article en

Abstract

The countermovement jump (CMJ) is a non-invasive, easily administered method to assess neuromuscular fatigue. However, prior studies have analyzed multiple correlated CMJ metrics without a clear rationale. To optimize the utility of the CMJ for fatigue detection and streamline its application, identifying a subset of uncorrelated metrics tailored to the fatigue context is essential. PURPOSE: This study aimed to statistically filter discrete CMJ metrics to optimize the detection of physical fatigue status. METHODS: Sixty-seven healthy, fit adults (Age: 21.9 ± 3.0 y, VO2PEAK: 47.2 ± 6.2 ml·kg-1·min-1, ♂/♀ = 39/28) completed four 30-min treadmill rucking blocks carrying 47% of their lean mass. Each block consisted of two 15-min phases: 1) at a speed equal to 47% VO2PEAK, and 2) to cover the maximum distance possible while self-adjusting speed. Three maximal effort CMJs without arm swing were performed on a calibrated AMTI force plate and averaged at baseline (PRE); between blocks (IB1-3); and at 0, 30, and 60 min of recovery (POST, POST30, POST60). Feature selection via differential analysis (p-value <10E-24, fold change > |1|) alongside correlation-based hierarchical clustering reduced 28 discrete CMJ parameters to a subset of key performance indicators. Linear mixed-effects models with a random subject term determined the influence of time and sex on the selected metrics (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Momentum (MOM), peak concentric velocity (PCV), mean concentric velocity (MCV), mean braking power (MBP), and mean braking force (MBF) were identified as most responsive to the fatigue protocol. Raw metric values and percent changes declined progressively from IB1, with large to extreme effect sizes (0.8 - >2.0) observed at POST, POST30, and POST60. MBP showed the largest percent change across recovery time points (%∆ at POST, POST30, and POST60: -11.53, -11.56, -14.96). MOM, PCV, and MCV were significantly higher in males compared to females based on absolute but not relative change. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for an approach to selecting specific CMJ metrics to assess physical fatigue progression. These findings can help practitioners optimize the detection of fatigue by focusing CMJ testing on the most useful indicators, enhancing training and recovery strategies in athletic and military contexts. Supported by: This work was made possible in part by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under Grant Number HR0011-22-2-0040. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of DARPA.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.