Visual Kinematic Feedback Improves Neuromuscular Performance During Resistance Training In Healthy Older Adults

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of real time, visual feedback on leg-press (LP) and chest-press (CP) peak power (PP) and average power (AP) using computerized pneumatic resistance training machines. METHODS: 28 older adults (73.1 ± 6.7 y) completed two training sessions on computerized pneumatic LP and CP machines (HUR USA, Northbrook, IL). Sessions were separated by 48 h. During one session, subjects were provided with verbal encouragement and to follow graphs showing their power outputs for each repetition on the machines’ tablets. In the other session, subjects were provided with the same level of encouragement without visual feedback. Both groups completed three sets of eight repetitions on each machine separated by a one-minute rest. RESULTS: Separate 2 x 3 (condition x set) repeated measures ANOVAs revealed a condition effect for LP-PP (F (1,26) = 11.122, p = .003, np2 = .300), with pairwise comparisons revealing significantly greater power in the visual feedback condition (MDiff ± SE = 21.18 ± 6.35 W; p = .003). Additionally, a main effect for set was also observed for CP-PP (F (2,25) = 17.701, p < .001, np2 = .586) showing significant increases in PP from set 1-2, 2-3, and 1-3. Significant condition effects were also observed for LP-AP (F (1,26) = 12.497, p = .002, np2 = .325) and CP-AP (F (1,25) = 8.795, p = .007, np2 = .260). Pairwise comparisons revealed significantly greater AP in the visual feedback condition for LP (23.50 ± 6.65 W; p = .002) and CP (10.58 ± 3.57 W; p = .007). Finally, a main effect for sets was observed for LP-AP (F (2,25) = 13.568, p < .001, np2 = .520) with pairwise comparisons revealing significant increases in AP from sets 1-2, 2-3, and 1-3. CONCLUSIONS: Visual kinematic feedback in the form of power bars is a viable tool for optimizing neuromuscular performance in older adults. Further, higher PP and AP across sets support the use of multiple sets to maximize neuromuscular improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001158452.67746.79
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Kinematic Feedback Improves Neuromuscular Performance During Resistance Training In Healthy Older Adults

Ethan Elkins, Joseph F. Signorile, Rachel Gastaldo, Caleb Calaway et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Visual Kinematic Feedback Improves Neuromuscular Performance During Resistance Training In Healthy Older Adults

Ethan Elkins, Joseph F. Signorile, Rachel Gastaldo, Caleb Calaway, Ryan Sands, Vivian Brunke, Molly Conn
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of real time, visual feedback on leg-press (LP) and chest-press (CP) peak power (PP) and average power (AP) using computerized pneumatic resistance training machines. METHODS: 28 older adults (73.1 ± 6.7 y) completed two training sessions on computerized pneumatic LP and CP machines (HUR USA, Northbrook, IL). Sessions were separated by 48 h. During one session, subjects were provided with verbal encouragement and to follow graphs showing their power outputs for each repetition on the machines’ tablets. In the other session, subjects were provided with the same level of encouragement without visual feedback. Both groups completed three sets of eight repetitions on each machine separated by a one-minute rest. RESULTS: Separate 2 x 3 (condition x set) repeated measures ANOVAs revealed a condition effect for LP-PP (F (1,26) = 11.122, p = .003, np2 = .300), with pairwise comparisons revealing significantly greater power in the visual feedback condition (MDiff ± SE = 21.18 ± 6.35 W; p = .003). Additionally, a main effect for set was also observed for CP-PP (F (2,25) = 17.701, p < .001, np2 = .586) showing significant increases in PP from set 1-2, 2-3, and 1-3. Significant condition effects were also observed for LP-AP (F (1,26) = 12.497, p = .002, np2 = .325) and CP-AP (F (1,25) = 8.795, p = .007, np2 = .260). Pairwise comparisons revealed significantly greater AP in the visual feedback condition for LP (23.50 ± 6.65 W; p = .002) and CP (10.58 ± 3.57 W; p = .007). Finally, a main effect for sets was observed for LP-AP (F (2,25) = 13.568, p < .001, np2 = .520) with pairwise comparisons revealing significant increases in AP from sets 1-2, 2-3, and 1-3. CONCLUSIONS: Visual kinematic feedback in the form of power bars is a viable tool for optimizing neuromuscular performance in older adults. Further, higher PP and AP across sets support the use of multiple sets to maximize neuromuscular improvements.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.