The Administration of Samaria in the Persian Period

From the extant sources, it is obvious that shortly after the Assyrian conquest, the former kingdom of Israel was incorporated into the Assyrian imperial administration as a province with the city of Samaria as its capital. Unfortunately, we have practically no documentation available on the administration of the province in the Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian periods. This picture changes dramatically under Persian rule. Beginning with the late sixth century, the number of sources that relate to the province of Samaria, now called by its Aramaic name Shamrayn Medinta, expands exponentially. This article focuses on the administration of the Samarian province, its role within the Persian provincial system and its political and economic relationship with its neighboring regions, especially with Yehud. It explores this question by assessing the material evidence (e. g., the Elephantine documents, the Wadi Daliyeh bullae and papyri , the Persian-period Samarian coinage, and other material) and focuses primarily on the question of the so-called dynasty of the Sanballatide governors and the historical and literary-historical place of Ezra 4 and Neh 1-6.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1628/hebai-2025-0021
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Administration of Samaria in the Persian Period

Benedikt Hensel
Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel
Archaeology and Historical Studies
article

The Administration of Samaria in the Persian Period

Benedikt Hensel
article en

Abstract

From the extant sources, it is obvious that shortly after the Assyrian conquest, the former kingdom of Israel was incorporated into the Assyrian imperial administration as a province with the city of Samaria as its capital. Unfortunately, we have practically no documentation available on the administration of the province in the Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian periods. This picture changes dramatically under Persian rule. Beginning with the late sixth century, the number of sources that relate to the province of Samaria, now called by its Aramaic name Shamrayn Medinta, expands exponentially. This article focuses on the administration of the Samarian province, its role within the Persian provincial system and its political and economic relationship with its neighboring regions, especially with Yehud. It explores this question by assessing the material evidence (e. g., the Elephantine documents, the Wadi Daliyeh bullae and papyri , the Persian-period Samarian coinage, and other material) and focuses primarily on the question of the so-called dynasty of the Sanballatide governors and the historical and literary-historical place of Ezra 4 and Neh 1-6.

Hebrew Bible and Ancient IsraelVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Archaeology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.