De falsa religione. Der Beitrag der Religionskritik zur pluralistischen Religionstheorie

The theory of religious pluralism assumes that several religions can lay claim to truth at the same time. However, this must not lead to an arbitrariness that simply allows everything that can somehow be described as religious to apply without restriction. In order to avoid such an anything goes approach, the pluralistic theory of religion must specify criteria for distinguishing between true and false religion. In this study, various criteria are discussed and evaluated as insufficient. Following Luther and Wittgenstein, two new criteria for identifying false religion are then proposed: 1.) false religion is one-sidedly eudemonistic. 2.) false religion confuses religion and science. In summary, false religion can therefore be described as a supposed science of happiness which, in contrast to true religion, prevents a real encounter with transcendence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1628/zthk-2025-0016
Primary Topic
Religion, Theology, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De falsa religione. Der Beitrag der Religionskritik zur pluralistischen Religionstheorie

Hendrik Klinge
Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
Religion, Theology, and Education
article

De falsa religione. Der Beitrag der Religionskritik zur pluralistischen Religionstheorie

Hendrik Klinge
article en

Abstract

The theory of religious pluralism assumes that several religions can lay claim to truth at the same time. However, this must not lead to an arbitrariness that simply allows everything that can somehow be described as religious to apply without restriction. In order to avoid such an anything goes approach, the pluralistic theory of religion must specify criteria for distinguishing between true and false religion. In this study, various criteria are discussed and evaluated as insufficient. Following Luther and Wittgenstein, two new criteria for identifying false religion are then proposed: 1.) false religion is one-sidedly eudemonistic. 2.) false religion confuses religion and science. In summary, false religion can therefore be described as a supposed science of happiness which, in contrast to true religion, prevents a real encounter with transcendence.

Zeitschrift für Theologie und KircheVol. 122(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Religion, Theology, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.