Logical Fallacy dalam Statement Iblis Berjasa dalam Penyaliban Yesus: Studi Analisis Kritis

This paper is designed to critically analyze the statement “the devil contributed to the crucifixion of Jesus” from the perspective of logical fallacy. The statement “the devil contributed to the crucifixion of Jesus” is a statement that is widely circulated in cyberspace. The statement contains a theological and logical fallacy. Theologically, the devil did not contribute to the crucifixion of Jesus. The redemption of Jesus Christ through the cross was God's grand plan from eternity. Logically, the statement “the devil contributed to the crucifixion of Jesus” contains logical errors such as “False Cause Fallacy”, “Post Hoc Fallacy”, “moralistic fallacy” and “Equivocation Fallacy”. Through a descriptive qualitative approach using literature study data collection, the author tries to critically analyze the statement. The analysis is done both theologically and logically to disarm the logical errors and theological errors in the statement. This paper provides a solid apologetic insight to provide logical, theological and academic explanations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Arrabona
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57058/juar.v8i1.148
Primary Topic
Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Logical Fallacy dalam Statement Iblis Berjasa dalam Penyaliban Yesus: Studi Analisis Kritis

Didit Yuliantono Adi, Daniel Pesah Purwonugroho
Jurnal Arrabona
Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
article

Logical Fallacy dalam Statement Iblis Berjasa dalam Penyaliban Yesus: Studi Analisis Kritis

Didit Yuliantono Adi, Daniel Pesah Purwonugroho
article en

Abstract

This paper is designed to critically analyze the statement “the devil contributed to the crucifixion of Jesus” from the perspective of logical fallacy. The statement “the devil contributed to the crucifixion of Jesus” is a statement that is widely circulated in cyberspace. The statement contains a theological and logical fallacy. Theologically, the devil did not contribute to the crucifixion of Jesus. The redemption of Jesus Christ through the cross was God's grand plan from eternity. Logically, the statement “the devil contributed to the crucifixion of Jesus” contains logical errors such as “False Cause Fallacy”, “Post Hoc Fallacy”, “moralistic fallacy” and “Equivocation Fallacy”. Through a descriptive qualitative approach using literature study data collection, the author tries to critically analyze the statement. The analysis is done both theologically and logically to disarm the logical errors and theological errors in the statement. This paper provides a solid apologetic insight to provide logical, theological and academic explanations.

Jurnal ArrabonaVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Logical Fallacy dalam Statement Iblis Berjasa dalam Penyaliban Yesus: Studi Analisis Kritis — Didit Yuliantono Adi, Daniel Pesah Purwonugroho · Jurnal Arrabona (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS