Pedestrian Profiling Based on Road Crossing Decisions in the Presence of Automated Vehicles: The Sorting Hat for Pedestrian Behaviours and Psychological Facets

Automated Vehicles (AVs) are being developed with the aim to reduce the occurrence and severity of Road Traffic Crashes (RTCs). Studies suggest AVs may improve the safety of Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs), particularly on road crossings. However, exposure to novel technology over time may lead to behavioural adaptation. Thus, understanding VRUs’ behavioural intentions towards AVs is crucial for their safe integration into traffic. We investigate four external factors pedestrians consider when crossing a road in front of an AV. An online questionnaire with 281 participants assessed crossing intentions, focusing on road gradient, weather, pedestrian–AV distance, and AV type. Personality traits and self-reported behaviour were measured. Anderson’s experimental protocol revealed all factors significantly influenced crossing decisions. Using hierarchical clustering followed by K-means clustering, the participants were classified into three different profiles: risk-averse, resolute, and indecisive pedestrians. We provide evidence of a strong link between crossing decisions, reported behaviours and psychological facets while interacting with an AV at crossings. Pedestrian profiling allows targeting preventative measures for groups based on unique characteristics, maximising efficiency thereof. Furthermore, pedestrian profiling can inform AV’s driving style to support safer road interactions. This is salient for resolute pedestrians, who take more risks, which may lead to severe RTCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810105
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedestrian Profiling Based on Road Crossing Decisions in the Presence of Automated Vehicles: The Sorting Hat for Pedestrian Behaviours and Psychological Facets

William Payre, Ben Horan, Sachita Shahi, Ashim Kumar Debnath et al.
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
article

Pedestrian Profiling Based on Road Crossing Decisions in the Presence of Automated Vehicles: The Sorting Hat for Pedestrian Behaviours and Psychological Facets

William Payre, Ben Horan, Sachita Shahi, Ashim Kumar Debnath, Stewart Birrell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Automated Vehicles (AVs) are being developed with the aim to reduce the occurrence and severity of Road Traffic Crashes (RTCs). Studies suggest AVs may improve the safety of Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs), particularly on road crossings. However, exposure to novel technology over time may lead to behavioural adaptation. Thus, understanding VRUs’ behavioural intentions towards AVs is crucial for their safe integration into traffic. We investigate four external factors pedestrians consider when crossing a road in front of an AV. An online questionnaire with 281 participants assessed crossing intentions, focusing on road gradient, weather, pedestrian–AV distance, and AV type. Personality traits and self-reported behaviour were measured. Anderson’s experimental protocol revealed all factors significantly influenced crossing decisions. Using hierarchical clustering followed by K-means clustering, the participants were classified into three different profiles: risk-averse, resolute, and indecisive pedestrians. We provide evidence of a strong link between crossing decisions, reported behaviours and psychological facets while interacting with an AV at crossings. Pedestrian profiling allows targeting preventative measures for groups based on unique characteristics, maximising efficiency thereof. Furthermore, pedestrian profiling can inform AV’s driving style to support safer road interactions. This is salient for resolute pedestrians, who take more risks, which may lead to severe RTCs.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(18)
Deakin University (AU), Coventry University (GB)
Deakin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.