Voluntary and involuntary risk of low energy availability (LEA): a narrative synthesis review of screening tools for athletes

Low energy availability (LEA) is resultant of insufficient dietary energy intake relative to exercise energy expenditure (EEE), compromising physiological function in athletes. Behaviours attributing to insufficient energy intakes and/or excessive EEE, and therefore risk of LEA, can be voluntary (“advertent”) or involuntary (“inadvertent”). Discriminating between and screening for voluntary and involuntary risk may prevent athletes from going undetected by traditional LEA and clinical eating disorder (ED) screening tools and facilitate more targeted support and interventions. A narrative synthesis review was conducted to assess the ability of current screening tools in discriminating between voluntary and involuntary risk of LEA. Studies were included if tools screened for contributors to LEA and had undergone validation research in athletes. Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria and were included in this study. Eleven tools were theoretically able to detect voluntary and involuntary LEA risk. Three were prominent in their potential to identify voluntary and involuntary risk (considering both eating and exercise behaviours), demonstrate validity across various athletic groups and provide a comprehensive screen across diverse samples of athletes (i.e., Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 [EDE-Q 6.0], Eating Disorders Screen for Athletes [EDSA], and Exercise Dependence and Elite Athletes Scale [EDEAS]). Although, it was apparent that different screening tools offer differing benefits for various groups and screening aims. Further validation is required to confirm the discriminatory ability of tools in distinguishing voluntary and involuntary risk of LEA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Performance Nutrition
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44410-025-00010-w
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voluntary and involuntary risk of low energy availability (LEA): a narrative synthesis review of screening tools for athletes

Gareth A. Wallis, Andrew Soundy, Rachel L. Chesters
Performance Nutrition
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Voluntary and involuntary risk of low energy availability (LEA): a narrative synthesis review of screening tools for athletes

Gareth A. Wallis, Andrew Soundy, Rachel L. Chesters
article en

Abstract

Low energy availability (LEA) is resultant of insufficient dietary energy intake relative to exercise energy expenditure (EEE), compromising physiological function in athletes. Behaviours attributing to insufficient energy intakes and/or excessive EEE, and therefore risk of LEA, can be voluntary (“advertent”) or involuntary (“inadvertent”). Discriminating between and screening for voluntary and involuntary risk may prevent athletes from going undetected by traditional LEA and clinical eating disorder (ED) screening tools and facilitate more targeted support and interventions. A narrative synthesis review was conducted to assess the ability of current screening tools in discriminating between voluntary and involuntary risk of LEA. Studies were included if tools screened for contributors to LEA and had undergone validation research in athletes. Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria and were included in this study. Eleven tools were theoretically able to detect voluntary and involuntary LEA risk. Three were prominent in their potential to identify voluntary and involuntary risk (considering both eating and exercise behaviours), demonstrate validity across various athletic groups and provide a comprehensive screen across diverse samples of athletes (i.e., Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 [EDE-Q 6.0], Eating Disorders Screen for Athletes [EDSA], and Exercise Dependence and Elite Athletes Scale [EDEAS]). Although, it was apparent that different screening tools offer differing benefits for various groups and screening aims. Further validation is required to confirm the discriminatory ability of tools in distinguishing voluntary and involuntary risk of LEA.

Performance NutritionVol. 1(1)
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.