Evaluation of Apical Closure in Panoramic Radiographs Using Vision Transformer Architectures ViT-Based Apical Closure Classification

<b>Objective</b>: To evaluate the performance of vision transformer (ViT)-based deep learning models in the classification of open apex on panoramic radiographs (orthopantomograms (OPGs)) and compare their diagnostic accuracy with conventional convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: OPGs were retrospectively collected and labeled by two observers based on apex closure status. Two ViT models (Base Patch16 and Patch32) and three CNN models (ResNet50, VGG19, and EfficientNetB0) were evaluated using eight classifiers (support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), XGBoost, logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), naïve Bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)). Performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC)) were computed. <b>Results</b>: ViT Base Patch16 384 with MLP achieved the highest accuracy (0.8462 ± 0.0330) and AUC (0.914 ± 0.032). Although CNN models like EfficientNetB0 + MLP performed competitively (0.8334 ± 0.0479 accuracy), ViT models demonstrated more balanced and robust performance. <b>Conclusions</b>: ViT models outperformed CNNs in classifying open apex, suggesting their integration into dental radiologic decision support systems. Future studies should focus on multi-center and multimodal data to improve generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Apical Closure in Panoramic Radiographs Using Vision Transformer Architectures ViT-Based Apical Closure Classification

Seda Arslan Tuncer, Merve Parlak Baydoğan, Sümeyye Coşgun Baybars, Merve Daldal
2 citations
Diagnostics
Dental Radiography and Imaging
3.58
article

Evaluation of Apical Closure in Panoramic Radiographs Using Vision Transformer Architectures ViT-Based Apical Closure Classification

Seda Arslan Tuncer, Merve Parlak Baydoğan, Sümeyye Coşgun Baybars, Merve Daldal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: To evaluate the performance of vision transformer (ViT)-based deep learning models in the classification of open apex on panoramic radiographs (orthopantomograms (OPGs)) and compare their diagnostic accuracy with conventional convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: OPGs were retrospectively collected and labeled by two observers based on apex closure status. Two ViT models (Base Patch16 and Patch32) and three CNN models (ResNet50, VGG19, and EfficientNetB0) were evaluated using eight classifiers (support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), XGBoost, logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), naïve Bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)). Performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC)) were computed. <b>Results</b>: ViT Base Patch16 384 with MLP achieved the highest accuracy (0.8462 ± 0.0330) and AUC (0.914 ± 0.032). Although CNN models like EfficientNetB0 + MLP performed competitively (0.8334 ± 0.0479 accuracy), ViT models demonstrated more balanced and robust performance. <b>Conclusions</b>: ViT models outperformed CNNs in classifying open apex, suggesting their integration into dental radiologic decision support systems. Future studies should focus on multi-center and multimodal data to improve generalizability.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(18)
Software Research and Development Consulting (TR), Teknoloji Arastirma ve Gelistirme Endustriyel Urunler Bilisim Teknolojileri San Tic (TR), National Medical Research Center of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.