Criteria and Ranges: A Study on Modular Selection in Grid-Type University Campuses

As the core spatial carriers for teaching, research, and academic exchange, university campuses have long been central subjects in architectural design research. As a distinct phenotypic type of university campus, the grid-type campus has gradually gained academic attention due to its modular characteristics, horizontal expandability, and flexible organization—with advantages including improved spatial efficiency, enhanced interdisciplinary interaction, and stronger adaptability. In this study, a typological analysis was performed on 23 representative global grid-type campuses to explore their planning concepts and module selection criteria. Research data were collected from literature reviews, architectural drawings, and Google Maps (Web) satellite images and visualized and analyzed using Origin Pro 2021. Results show that campus module selection is primarily influenced by three factors: walking distance, functional requirements, and structural systems. At the master planning level, module selection aligns with the “five-minute walking radius” standard, and campus scale is generally controlled within 500 × 350 m. At the architectural level, functional needs determine that module sizes typically range from 50–90 m or 7.2–10 m. At the structural level, module ranges are usually 7–18 m, depending on usage requirements and structural systems. This study’s findings can provide theoretical support and practical references for the planning, design, and module selection of future grid-type university campuses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183357
Primary Topic
Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criteria and Ranges: A Study on Modular Selection in Grid-Type University Campuses

Gang Feng, Yaxin Wang, Fei Chen
Buildings
Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT
article

Criteria and Ranges: A Study on Modular Selection in Grid-Type University Campuses

Gang Feng, Yaxin Wang, Fei Chen
article en

Abstract

As the core spatial carriers for teaching, research, and academic exchange, university campuses have long been central subjects in architectural design research. As a distinct phenotypic type of university campus, the grid-type campus has gradually gained academic attention due to its modular characteristics, horizontal expandability, and flexible organization—with advantages including improved spatial efficiency, enhanced interdisciplinary interaction, and stronger adaptability. In this study, a typological analysis was performed on 23 representative global grid-type campuses to explore their planning concepts and module selection criteria. Research data were collected from literature reviews, architectural drawings, and Google Maps (Web) satellite images and visualized and analyzed using Origin Pro 2021. Results show that campus module selection is primarily influenced by three factors: walking distance, functional requirements, and structural systems. At the master planning level, module selection aligns with the “five-minute walking radius” standard, and campus scale is generally controlled within 500 × 350 m. At the architectural level, functional needs determine that module sizes typically range from 50–90 m or 7.2–10 m. At the structural level, module ranges are usually 7–18 m, depending on usage requirements and structural systems. This study’s findings can provide theoretical support and practical references for the planning, design, and module selection of future grid-type university campuses.

BuildingsVol. 15(18)
Tianjin University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tianjin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.