The Impact of Personnel Actions on Official Bonding Activities: An Examination of County Governments

The protection of government assets is often a public policy feature that can easily be overlooked. Proper bonding of public officials with asset responsibilities provides an assurance of resource protection and public trust. This study examines the level of impact that internal and external county characteristics have on the incremental bonding practices of appointed and elected government officials in North Carolina. Preliminary findings indicate more standardized bonding practices for appointed officials while bonding for elected officials is more discretionary to a point. Traditional finance office staff and audit findings influenced bond amount increases for both appointed and elected officials with specific importance placed on the accounts payable position. Implications of the study include the importance of well-trained finance personnel that can limit unnecessary risks and additional bonding increases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.xq9acn31
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Personnel Actions on Official Bonding Activities: An Examination of County Governments

Doug Goodman, LaShonda M. Stewart, Steve Modlin
Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

The Impact of Personnel Actions on Official Bonding Activities: An Examination of County Governments

Doug Goodman, LaShonda M. Stewart, Steve Modlin
article en

Abstract

The protection of government assets is often a public policy feature that can easily be overlooked. Proper bonding of public officials with asset responsibilities provides an assurance of resource protection and public trust. This study examines the level of impact that internal and external county characteristics have on the incremental bonding practices of appointed and elected government officials in North Carolina. Preliminary findings indicate more standardized bonding practices for appointed officials while bonding for elected officials is more discretionary to a point. Traditional finance office staff and audit findings influenced bond amount increases for both appointed and elected officials with specific importance placed on the accounts payable position. Implications of the study include the importance of well-trained finance personnel that can limit unnecessary risks and additional bonding increases.

Journal of Public and Nonprofit AffairsVol. 11(2)
University of Central Florida (US), Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US), University of Southern Indiana (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.